Closed Bug 311392 Opened 19 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Typos and proper name of Red Hat's stuff

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)

2.21
defect
Not set
trivial

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Bugzilla 3.4

People

(Reporter: mgarski, Assigned: selsky)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 2 obsolete files)

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7

Grep bugzilla source for "redhat" and "red hat", you will notice many mistakes
in Red Hat and Red Hat Linux names. I'll attach patch that correct this mistakes
(excluding .pdf file).

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Grep bugzilla source for "redhat" and "red hat"
Attached patch Proper Red Hat's names (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Version: unspecified → 2.21
Comment on attachment 198721 [details] [diff] [review]
Proper Red Hat's names

txt and html files are generated by the xml ones and are not part of the source
code.
Attachment #198721 - Flags: review-
Please provide an updated patch.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Here you have updated patch. In this patch I've also fix some Mandrake stuff.
Attachment #198721 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Fix Red Hat & Mandriva names.  Also, clean up package format names.
Assignee: documentation → selsky
Attachment #202900 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #520938 - Flags: review?(documentation)
Comment on attachment 520938 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix vendor names and package format names

Looks fine. r=dkl
Attachment #520938 - Flags: review?(documentation) → review+
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval4.0?
Flags: approval3.6?
Flags: approval3.4?
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval4.0?
Flags: approval4.0+
Flags: approval3.6?
Flags: approval3.6+
Flags: approval3.4?
Flags: approval3.4+
Flags: approval+
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 3.4
By the way, docs patches of this size don't need approval. (Only major content changes need approval.)
OS: Linux → Windows CE
Thanks Max and Matt.

trunk:
Committing to: bzr+ssh://dlawrence%40mozilla.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/
modified docs/en/README.docs
modified docs/en/xml/installation.xml
Committed revision 7756.

4.0:
Committing to: bzr+ssh://dlawrence%40mozilla.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/4.0/
modified docs/en/README.docs
modified docs/en/xml/installation.xml
Committed revision 7565.

3.6:
Committing to: bzr+ssh://dlawrence%40mozilla.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/3.6/
modified docs/en/README.docs
modified docs/en/xml/installation.xml
Committed revision 7242.

3.4:
Committing to: bzr+ssh://dlawrence%40mozilla.com@bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/3.4/
modified docs/en/README.docs
modified docs/en/xml/installation.xml
Committed revision 6798.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
OS: Windows CE → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Wow, nearly six years to fix bug with patch provided by me as reporter! Nice speed, but at least it's fixed ;)
(In reply to comment #9)
> Wow, nearly six years to fix bug with patch provided by me as reporter! Nice
> speed, but at least it's fixed ;)

  Hey Marcin! I agree that that was a long time. Very possibly what happened was that we didn't know there was a patch available, because there was no review request set. We're better at catching that these days, but we weren't very good at catching it in 2005. If you send us another patch in the future, here's how to get it reviewed more quickly:

  http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Developers
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: