324734 - Bug list says there are 49 bugs but only displays one

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, defect)

Description

[Karsten Silz]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051111 Firefox/1.5

I displayed a saved search which should display all 49 bugs but only showed on.

Reproducible: Couldn't Reproduce

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Display saved search.

Actual Results:  
One bug in the list.

Expected Results:  
49 bugs in the list.

Comment 1

[Karsten Silz]

Attachment: Only one bug is shown instead of 49 ones.

Comment 2

[Frédéric Buclin]

We cannot help if you don't tell us the kind of query you ran. And you say you cannot reproduce?

Comment 3

[Karsten Silz]

(In reply to comment #2)
> We cannot help if you don't tell us the kind of query you ran. And you say you
> cannot reproduce?
> 

The query is: all new / assigned / reopened bugs in one Bugzilla product, saved as a search in my footer and invoked from there.  I tried to reproduce it by clicking around and then hitting that specific query. So for, I got just one bug once more - haven't found a pattern here, though.

Comment 4

[Frédéric Buclin]

If you have no testcase to reproduce the problem, this bug will probably ends as WFM.

Comment 5

[Karsten Silz]

(In reply to comment #4)
> If you have no testcase to reproduce the problem, this bug will probably ends
> as WFM.

That's life - then I'll just have to cope with the bug whenever it occurs.

Comment 6

[Teemu Mannermaa (:wicked)]

I have seen this numerous times on bmo. Usually it says it found X bugs but doesn't so anything in the list. Looks like you are also using Firefox, I wonder if this is a browser rendering bug. I just got this problem and looked at View Source that had the lines there but they were never shown. Could also be something strange in the generated HTML output too.

Refresh usually end up fixing this. Today I keep getting hit by this all the time on bmo. Could be a issue with DB load or something like that too..

Comment 7

[Teemu Mannermaa (:wicked)]

Attachment: Truncated bug list

Comment 8

[Karsten Silz]

Yes, I also use Firefox.  I've seen it happening a number of times recently, showing just one or a few records while the search results claim a lot of results.  Our Bugzilla runs on Suse Linux 9.x.

Comment 9

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

(In reply to comment #6)
> ... looked at View Source that had the lines there but they were never shown.

if you save the source to disk and reload it from disk, does it still not display all the rows?

I've also seen this a few times.

Comment 10

[Marc Schumann [:Wurblzap]]

I've seen this, too. Maybe it's a browser issue, or something about server push? I'm using FF 1.5.0.1.

When the bug occurs, the number of bugs shown varies for me, but it's usually a lowish number (read: something below 10).

Comment 11

[Karsten Silz]

I also run Firefox 1.5.0.1.  But if the page HTML source doesn't include the bug list then this doesn't seem to be a browser rendering bug since Firefox can't render what isn't there.

Comment 12

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

Attachment: in this screen shot no bugs listed

(In reply to comment #11)
> I also run Firefox 1.5.0.1.  But if the page HTML source doesn't include the
> bug list then this doesn't seem to be a browser rendering bug since Firefox
> can't render what isn't there.

I suspect this will get closed as a browser issue. In my case the problem is with the browser because the full source is there - I saved the source, examined it, and opened the local file in FF just fine. Another possibility, IIRC, partitial table display can also happen if certain characters are in the table (I no longer remember the bug#)

If you find that the full HTML source isn't there then please post the source as an attachment.

In the screen shot attached, I opened a bookmarked group of addresses (below) in FF 1.5 with middle click. I've seen lots of truncations before but I can't recall if they ever happened other than with this bookmarks group.
  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Core&product=Mozilla+Application+Suite&chfieldfrom=0d&chfieldto=Now&chfield=%5BBug+creation%5D
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&changedin=1&chfield=%5BBug+creation%5D&chfieldto=Now
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=SeaMonkeyAll&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&sortby=Date&date=day&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot
http://mozillanews.org/bonsai/
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/nightly/latest/
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_severity=blocker&keywords=smoketest&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time

Comment 13

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

some suspects:
Bug 199569 (fancy this - originally filed against bugzilla:querylist)
Bug 139021
Bug 187550

Comment 14

[Karsten Silz]

Attachment: Truncated bug list screenshot.

Comment 15

[Karsten Silz]

Attachment: Truncated bug list source code.

Comment 16

[Karsten Silz]

I stand corrected - it just happened to me again (Firefox 1.5.0.3 on Win XP), and the source code (attachement 223605) shows that all the bugs are there but don't seem to be rendered for one reason or another (attachement 223605).  Can somebody please verify this with the source code?  If this is a Firefox bug indeed then I'm happy to open up a Firefox bug.  :-)

Comment 17

[Karsten Silz]

(In reply to comment #16)
> I stand corrected - it just happened to me again (Firefox 1.5.0.3 on Win XP),
> and the source code (attachement 223605) shows that all the bugs are there but
> don't seem to be rendered for one reason or another (attachement 223605).  Can
> somebody please verify this with the source code?  If this is a Firefox bug
> indeed then I'm happy to open up a Firefox bug.  :-)

And when I clicked "Refresh" the bug list was show correctly.

Comment 18

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Yeah, okay, then. It's INVALID only because it's not a Bugzilla bug, but a Firefox bug. Feel free to file a Firefox bug and reference this one.