Closed
Bug 327065
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
misc necko cleanup
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: Biesinger, Assigned: Biesinger)
Details
Attachments
(5 files)
1.23 KB,
patch
|
darin.moz
:
review+
darin.moz
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
773 bytes,
patch
|
darin.moz
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
847 bytes,
patch
|
darin.moz
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.25 KB,
patch
|
darin.moz
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.12 KB,
patch
|
darin.moz
:
review+
darin.moz
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I have some patches in my tree that fix some minor things in necko... I'll use this bug for all of them, they're not worth filing one bug for each.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #211777 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Attachment #211777 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #211778 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
(it's a failure because onStartRequest always throws here)
Attachment #211780 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #211781 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
make stuff static, remove unused code, PRBool->PRPackedBool
Attachment #211784 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Attachment #211784 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #211777 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Attachment #211777 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #211777 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Attachment #211777 -
Flags: review+
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #211778 -
Flags: review?(darin) → review+
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #211780 -
Flags: review?(darin) → review+
Updated•19 years ago
|
Attachment #211781 -
Flags: review?(darin) → review+
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 211784 [details] [diff] [review] misc cleanup hmm... I'm not so sure it makes sense to prefer PRPackedBool over PRBool when there is only one PRBool. all your doing is forcing the CPU to read/write a byte instead of a word, and it anyways fetches a word, so there isn't much benefit to this.
Attachment #211784 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Attachment #211784 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #211784 -
Flags: review?(darin)
Attachment #211784 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
checked in, except that PRPackedBool change Checking in netwerk/base/src/nsAsyncStreamListener.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/base/src/nsAsyncStreamListener.cpp,v <-- nsAsyncStreamListener.cpp new revision: 1.49; previous revision: 1.48 done Checking in netwerk/base/src/nsFileStreams.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/base/src/nsFileStreams.cpp,v <-- nsFileStreams.cpp new revision: 1.74; previous revision: 1.73 done Checking in netwerk/base/src/nsLoadGroup.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/base/src/nsLoadGroup.cpp,v <-- nsLoadGroup.cpp new revision: 1.69; previous revision: 1.68 done Checking in netwerk/streamconv/converters/nsIndexedToHTML.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/streamconv/converters/nsIndexedToHTML.cpp,v <-- nsIndexedToHTML.cpp new revision: 1.72; previous revision: 1.71 done Checking in netwerk/test/TestOpen.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/test/TestOpen.cpp,v <-- TestOpen.cpp new revision: 1.8; previous revision: 1.7 done Checking in netwerk/test/TestProtocols.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/test/TestProtocols.cpp,v <-- TestProtocols.cpp new revision: 1.113; previous revision: 1.112 done Checking in netwerk/test/unit/test_cookie_header.js; /cvsroot/mozilla/netwerk/test/unit/test_cookie_header.js,v <-- test_cookie_header.js new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•