Closed
Bug 332654
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
New mail of SeaMonkey can not handle cut and past of email from Outlook Express
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: weconsul, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060403 SeaMonkey/1.5a Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060403 SeaMonkey/1.5a The data copied from an Outlook express email canot translate the HTML code when pasted into the new SeaMonkey email. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open an email from Outlook Express. 2.Open a create New email from SeaMonkey. 3.Copy some or all of the email content froom Outlook Express (Select, Cntrl-C) 4.Paste (Cntrl-V) into the newly open blank email for SeaMonket. As of the nightly as of 04/03 I just downloaded. It will not paste anything. Unless I past as quoted text or past without formatting. Which is wired, because when creating a responce message to a newsgroup thread. 90% of the time it will only let me paste as quote. This is no good. So I have waste time taking the quote symbol out so the message does not get confused to the text being replied to. Actual Results: The last two cases possibly illustrate a bug, in that the sequence expression is obviously (and perhaps inadvertently) pushed down to the interator used to discover the count result, whereas, without refering to the SQL standard, I think its quite probable that the 'next value for' expression is supposed to be applied 'last' to the single row result obtained from the output of the count aggregate. Also, there are a number of places that HSQLDB freely allows the use of 'next value for', despite our being aware that those places are explicitly disallowed by the SQL standard. As for the first case, it is correct because the table has no rows at that point. You'll get the same thing selection 1 or "a string" or anything else from a table with no rows. Indeed, I think that's part of why Oracle provides the DUAL table (create table dual(dummy varchar2); insert into dual values(null); grant select on dual to public). OTOH, selecting count from an empty table obviously must generate a result...how else to represent a count of zero? In general, the same applies to all aggregate queries, where each virtual table (each subset representing an aggregate group) generates a row in the output result.
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
WFM Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9b4pre) Gecko/2008020803 SeaMonkey/2.0a1pre data copied from outlook on XP (I don't have outlook express)
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•