Closed
Bug 371874
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Cleanup layout reftest lists
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Assigned: RyanVM)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
17.89 KB,
patch
|
dbaron
:
review+
dbaron
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Attached is a patch which sorts all of the layout reftests by bug number and alphabetically when necessary.
Attachment #256567 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #256567 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
So in many cases the order was semantic -- starting with easier tests and moving to harder tests. I think the only ones that should be sorted are the bugs, and just by bug number (leaving the current order within bugs). And at the same time we should probably create a reftest.list in the bugs/ subdirectory and include it in the one above.
Attachment #256567 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #256567 -
Flags: superreview-
Attachment #256567 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Attachment #256567 -
Flags: review-
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #256738 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #256738 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Comment on attachment 256738 [details] [diff] [review] Sort only bug reftests and move them to separate list Yep, looks good. r+sr=dbaron. Do you need someone to land this for you?
Attachment #256738 -
Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #256738 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #256738 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Attachment #256738 -
Flags: review+
Assignee: nobody → ryanvm
Checked in to trunk. (I also added a comment at the top saying to keep it sorted by bug number.) Thanks for the patch.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
For the record, the object/ tests were sorted by the ordering found at their original location on biesi's site, so not rearranging them was the right thing to do. :-) I dislike opaque numbers, tho, so I tried to give them meaningful names to aid in guessing what they do if any one were to fail in the future.
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
and I did try to list simpler tests first, more complex tests later there.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•