Closed
Bug 378906
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
edit user back to the edit user list should rely on Referrer not url encoding the search
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Administration, task)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 326108
People
(Reporter: timeless, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
I just spent a couple of hours dealing w/ edit users. From my perspective (today), it's *much* more important for me to know if I've already edited a user than for me to know if I've already edited a person because I used different criteria to find the person. Steps to reproduce: 1. search for users by domain 2. edit a number of users 3. decide that some users don't match the domain 4. search for users matching '@' 5. find a user and try to decide if you've already edited a user 6. realize that you can't use standard link purpling because the edituser search list includes the search query in its url. Expected results: Back to search should rely on the referrer header (if it isn't there, offer a standard "search for new users" link and a "Browser Back <javascript:history.go(-1)" link) and the urls for editing a user should be tied to the user. It's ok for user links to change if I rename them (I was an admin today, you'll see when I file other bugs).
Updated•9 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•