Closed
Bug 407476
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
make a copy of nsAccessibilityUtils
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
6.94 KB,
patch
|
aaronlev
:
review+
mtschrep
:
approval1.9-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
187 bytes,
text/plain
|
aaronlev
:
review+
mtschrep
:
approval1.9-
|
Details |
make a copy of files original files: accessible\src\base\nsAccessibilityUtils.h accessible\src\base\nsAccessibilityUtils.cpp destination file: accessible\src\base\nsAccUtils.h accessible\src\base\nsAccUtils.cpp Original files won't be needed after coping. Should I put the patch now to use new files that will be checked in it simultaneously with file coping? Or is it preferable to file another bug where I remove old files and will use new files?
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
We need to copy these files because nsAccessiblityUtils class has been renamed to nsAccUtils in bug 386922.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
use new files patch
Attachment #292201 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > Original files won't be needed after coping. Should I put the patch now to use > new files that will be checked in it simultaneously with file coping? Or is it > preferable to file another bug where I remove old files and will use new files? Since you already attached a patch to this bug, I would move this bug back to an a11y-related component, attach a cvscopy file there and get review on it, then file antoher cvs copy bug referencing the reviewed cvscopy file.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
How should cvscopy file look like and who should review it, accessibility peer?
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > How should cvscopy file look like and who should review it, accessibility peer? See attachment 290895 [details] for an example, and yes, an a11y peer/owner should review it.
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
Basically, the file consists of lines of: path/to/old/file path/to/new/file
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292207 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292207 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 292207 [details]
cvs copy
This is wrong. Need to use '/' instead of '\', and while you can start at accessible/, it is preferred that the cvscopy file start at mozilla/.
Attachment #292207 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
sorry. new cvscopy file.
Attachment #292207 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Component: CVS: Copy → Disability Access APIs
Product: mozilla.org → Core
Version: other → Trunk
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: server-ops → aaronleventhal
QA Contact: justin → accessibility-apis
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 292208 [details]
cvs copy
This is better, but I doubt you meant to copy the same file twice. :)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292208 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: aaronleventhal → surkov.alexander
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > (From update of attachment 292208 [details]) > This is better, but I doubt you meant to copy the same file twice. :) > thank you, I need to be more careful
Attachment #292208 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #292209 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Attachment #292208 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292209 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal) → review+
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
Why I are you doing this right now though? It conflicts with a big patch I have in bug 398910.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292201 -
Flags: review?(aaronleventhal) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12) > Why I are you doing this right now though? It conflicts with a big patch I have > in bug 398910. > good question 1) I was aroung when introduced hypertext utils file, I remembered I wanted to rename it. 2) Previously it took a long time to copy files therefore I decided to start it now 3) I missed you patch banaly :)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292201 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292209 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Comment 14•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 292201 [details] [diff] [review] use new files Until you guys resolve comment 12
Attachment #292201 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9-
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 292209 [details] cvs copy Until you guys resolve comment 12
Attachment #292209 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9-
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•16 years ago
|
||
fixed in bug 459973
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•