Closed
Bug 423336
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Memory Leak Report from Leak Gauge for Firefox 3 Beta 4 RC2 with Adblock Plus installed
Categories
(Core :: General, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: cbook, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: memory-leak)
Attachments
(1 file)
79.64 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b4) Gecko/2008030714 Firefox/3.0b4 As discussed with Jonas, this is a spin off from Bug 421703 for the second leak gauge log. As Steps to reproduce i installed as Part of the Smoketests for Firefox 3 Beta 4 RC 2 the Adblock Plus Extension from AMO (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865) and surfed a little around to test the extension. I was also on the heise website (http://www.heise.de) After this i closed Firefox to check the Leak Gauge Log and got the Leak Gauge Log Result Output: Results of processing log leak3.log : Leaked outer window 211bcc0 at address 211bcc0. Leaked outer window 1219280 at address 1219280. Leaked inner window 1219430 (outer 1219280) at address 1219430. ... with URI "about:blank". Leaked content nodes associated with node info manager at address 238a3c0. Leaked content nodes associated with node info manager at address 1ae2d60. ... with document URI "http://www.heise.de/". Summary: Leaked 3 out of 105 DOM Windows Leaked 0 out of 112 documents Leaked 0 out of 35 docshells Leaked content nodes in 2 out of 122 documents David could you a take a look at the log ?
Flags: blocking1.9?
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Again, marking blocking pending investigation by david. P2.
Flags: blocking1.9? → blocking1.9+
Priority: -- → P2
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
was not able to reproduce this leak with the RC2 of Firefox Beta 5, will renom or file a new bug when i run into this leak again
Flags: blocking1.9+
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
WFM per comment 2
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•