Closed
Bug 496855
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
sanitycheck hooks
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Administration, task)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 3.6
People
(Reporter: bbaetz, Assigned: bbaetz)
Details
(Whiteboard: [es-ita])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
8.98 KB,
patch
|
mkanat
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Some extensions may want to sanitycheck their schemas/etc. We should allow that via hooks.
Attachment #382091 -
Flags: review?(mkanat)
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [es-ita]
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 382091 [details] [diff] [review] Patch >--- sanitycheck.cgi 31 Mar 2009 19:16:13 -0000 1.144 >+Bugzilla::Hook::process("sanitycheck-repair", { status => \&Status }); Hmm, doesn't it seem like we should be putting that subroutine into some library, instead? >--- Bugzilla/Hook.pm 18 Dec 2008 17:18:25 -0000 1.24 >+This hook allows for extra sanity checks to be added. Add "to F<sanitycheck.cgi>" at the end of that sentence. >+This hook allows for extra sanity check repairs to be made. And there. You might want to describe a bit more what "sanity check repairs" means. >+++ extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-checks.pl 5 Jun 2009 07:16:52 -0000 This looks like you included the ITA file, which is too much and too complex for an example. >+++ extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-repair.pl 5 Jun 2009 07:16:52 -0000 Same here. >+ [% ELSE %] >+ [% message = Hook.process("statuses") %] Template hooks don't return anything, as far as I know...does that actually work?
Attachment #382091 -
Flags: review?(mkanat) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > (From update of attachment 382091 [details] [diff] [review]) > >--- sanitycheck.cgi 31 Mar 2009 19:16:13 -0000 1.144 > >+Bugzilla::Hook::process("sanitycheck-repair", { status => \&Status }); > > Hmm, doesn't it seem like we should be putting that subroutine into some > library, instead? Its just a wrapper arround a custom message template. Not really worth it. > >+++ extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-checks.pl 5 Jun 2009 07:16:52 -0000 > > This looks like you included the ITA file, which is too much and too complex > for an example. Oops. I have an example; looks like I copied the wrong files over. > >+ [% ELSE %] > >+ [% message = Hook.process("statuses") %] > > Template hooks don't return anything, as far as I know...does that actually > work? Yes, it works. its the same as assiging the results of a BLOCK or any other subtemplate
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
I didn't actually have an example one for these hooks (got confused with a different hook). So I wrote one.
Attachment #382091 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #384369 -
Flags: review?(mkanat)
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 384369 [details] [diff] [review] v2 I love your example, but it's kind of important that the example plugin be incapable of modifying the database. Also, it's nice to put the word "Example" in the output somewhere so that people know that it came from the plugin.
Attachment #384369 -
Flags: review?(mkanat) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
I guess I can have a repair that just prints something....
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #384369 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #394711 -
Flags: review?(mkanat)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #394711 -
Flags: review?(mkanat) → review+
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 394711 [details] [diff] [review] v3 This looks good, but I think "checks" should become "check" on checkin (because "repair" is also singular).
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
I think this hook is too invasive to land on the branch.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Flags: approval+
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 3.6
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
I did the fix on checkin. I'll attach a new patch that's exactly what was checked in. Checking in sanitycheck.cgi; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/sanitycheck.cgi,v <-- sanitycheck.cgi new revision: 1.146; previous revision: 1.145 done Checking in Bugzilla/Hook.pm; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm,v <-- Hook.pm new revision: 1.30; previous revision: 1.29 done RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-check.pl,v done Checking in extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-check.pl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-check.pl,v <-- sanitycheck-check.pl initial revision: 1.1 done RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-repair.pl,v done Checking in extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-repair.pl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/extensions/example/code/sanitycheck-repair.pl,v <-- sanitycheck-repair.pl initial revision: 1.1 done RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/extensions/example/template/en/admin/sanitycheck/messages-statuses.html.tmpl,v done Checking in extensions/example/template/en/admin/sanitycheck/messages-statuses.html.tmpl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/extensions/example/template/en/admin/sanitycheck/messages-statuses.html.tmpl,v <-- messages-statuses.html.tmpl initial revision: 1.1 done Checking in template/en/default/admin/sanitycheck/messages.html.tmpl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/admin/sanitycheck/messages.html.tmpl,v <-- messages.html.tmpl new revision: 1.11; previous revision: 1.10 done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #394711 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #401952 -
Flags: review+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•