Closed
Bug 505044
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Selection lost when leaving a folder and coming back into it (mailnews.remember_selected_message doesn't work)
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Folder and Message Lists, defect)
Thunderbird
Folder and Message Lists
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Thunderbird 3.0b4
People
(Reporter: LpSolit, Assigned: rain1)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [no l10n impact][regression range 20090628-20090629])
Attachments
(1 file)
2.88 KB,
patch
|
asuth
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This was working fine with beta 2, so this is a regression in beta 3: - Select a message in your list - Go into another folder - Come back to the first folder The initially selected message should be redisplayed, but is not. The selection is lost.
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3?
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Potential duplicate of bug 497348.
Toggling mailnews.remember_selected_message doesn't make a difference, it is treated "false" in either case (testing 3.0b3 build on Linux). The description for bug 497348 states: > A server resync is performed, and _then_ the previously selected email is > selected. which is different (no mail is selected in this case at all). Also, I'm seeing this for both IMAP and local folders, thus independent of resyncing.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Very annoying regression indeed.
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3? → blocking-thunderbird3+
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Summary: Selection lost when leaving a folder and coming back into it → Selection lost when leaving a folder and coming back into it (mailnews.remember_selected_message doesn't work)
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0b4
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Assigning to clarkbw for input - I think the core issue here is the same as per bug 497348 and we need a UX decision on what we are going to do here. The discussion on bug 497348 is especially worth a read.
Assignee: nobody → clarkbw
Depends on: 497348
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
I peg the regression range at 20090628-20090629 and likely makes the regressor one of sid0's bugs * bug 467768 - No way to make mail open in tabs by default * Bug 500657 - open message from Search Messages results does not work well The regression got shipped in beta 3 - which suggests we don't have any tests for this behavior. Unless you're someone who lives in one folder this is very dogfoodish, eg flipping folders or doing folder maintenance, which I was doing today in a big way. What saved me from going crazy was (ironically) tabs, because I could have a tab open for each folder I was working with.
Blocks: 467768
Whiteboard: regression range 20090628-20090629
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Yes, this was broken by bug 467768 -- <http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/diff/01bd846dbb7e/mail/base/content/folderDisplay.js#l1.55>. There were several problems because of this (mainly with multiple message loads on startup with tab persistence on and a few message tabs open), and asuth said that since we're going to be adding folder summaries, it would be fine if I remove that code. If we decide to add it back we'll need to rework it to prevent multiple loads from happening at startup. It shouldn't be too hard I guess.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: regression range 20090628-20090629 → [regression range 20090628-20090629][no l10n impact]
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
In the folder summary - bug 492158 - designs we had planned to handle the previous selection inside the summary. However the folder summary is not landing w/ TB3.0 so we'll need to figure out a way to bring this back. sid, do you want to take this?
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: clarkbw → sid.bugzilla
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
Seems like bug 498514 was the cause of all the grief, which means that all I needed to do was to reintroduce the code :)
Attachment #398701 -
Flags: review?(bugmail)
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [regression range 20090628-20090629][no l10n impact] → [regression range 20090628-20090629][no l10n impact][needs review asuth]
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #398701 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [regression range 20090628-20090629][no l10n impact][needs review asuth] → [no l10n impact][regression range 20090628-20090629][needs review asuth]
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact][regression range 20090628-20090629][needs review asuth] → [no l10n impact][regression range 20090628-20090629][needs landing]
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/1a6524fa578d
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact][regression range 20090628-20090629][needs landing] → [no l10n impact][regression range 20090628-20090629]
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite+
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
Can you, please, take a look at this issue as well: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=515301 ? Thank you!
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•