Closed Bug 507453 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago

negative indexes on built-in objects sometimes return special properties

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect, P2)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
status1.9.2 --- beta1-fixed
status1.9.1 --- .8-fixed

People

(Reporter: sayrer, Assigned: brendan)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

See attached URL for the stuff people have turned up. Secure JavaScript subsets consider this a problem.
js> function args() { print(arguments[-3] == arguments.callee); print(typeof arguments[-3]); } 
js> args()
true
function
Flags: blocking1.9.2+
Sure, remove it, and bye bye introspection when "use strict" will be considered, right? This was my last hope about your .callee decision ... gone!

You have [-2] and [-1] as well at this point, have a look.
P.S. my first comment in that post:
I wrote about arguments secrets few weeks ago but I tested performances as well. Length, as callee, cost definitively more to be exposed but if these property will be there with “use strict” they could save JS debug!
Depends on: 507573
Blake says this is a P2.  Brendan, if this requires a beta, please mark as P2.
Priority: -- → P2
This was fixed by the patch for bug 453728.

/be
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 453728]
bug 453728 was fixed last year.
Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 453728]
(In reply to comment #7)
> bug 453728 was fixed last year.

Sorry, pasted wrong bug #, as the "Depends on:" line shows; should be bug 507573.

There's some interest in a spot-fix to 1.9.1.x. Cc'ing dveditz, I'll attach the minimal patch in a bit.

/be
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Attached patch one-line fixSplinter Review
This is wanted on 1.9.1.x for the object-capability language verifiers targeting JS, so they don't have to blacklist indexing to avoid capability leaks.

/be
Attachment #420403 - Flags: review?(igor)
Attachment #420403 - Flags: review?(igor) → review+
Attachment #420403 - Flags: approval1.9.1.8?
Comment on attachment 420403 [details] [diff] [review]
one-line fix

Approved for 1.9.1.8, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Attachment #420403 - Flags: approval1.9.1.8? → approval1.9.1.8+
Whiteboard: [needs 1.9.1 landing]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: