Closed
Bug 527358
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Can't set a repeating event with an end date
Categories
(Calendar :: Lightning Only, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: fraser.gordon, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 Build Identifier: Lightning 0.9 (build 2008091719) I want to create an event that repeats weekly, but only lasts for 4 weeks. From what I can see in Thunderbird with the Lightning add-on, I can create a weekly recurring event that never ends, or I can create one gigantic event that runs today to 4 weeks from now, non-stop. I have seen references online to a "Custom" option for repeating events that I am assuming is available in Sunbird which supposedly allows you to change infinitely repeating events to events with a controlled number of repetitions. I have looked everywhere, and cannot see an equivalent option for Lightning. For example, create an event that runs Sundays from 1:00PM - 2:00PM , starting November 1st, and repeating until Sunday, November 22nd Sunday Nov. 1st - 13:00-14:00 Sunday Nov. 8th - 13:00-14:00 Sunday Nov. 15th - 13:00-14:00 Sunday Nov. 22nd - 13:00-14:00 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an event on November 1st(Sunday) running from 13:00-14:00 2. Set the Repeat to "Weekly" 3. Actual Results: Infintely-repeating event is created (every Sunday from Nov. 1st on) running from 13:00-14:00, and no option to restrict the number of repetitions. Expected Results: I would expect when choosing a "Repeat" option, to be presented with an "Until" option and/or a "Number of occurrences" option (consider Google Calendar for an example).
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
"Custom..." is the last entry in the "Repeat" dropdown menu.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Apologies - didn't see that last entry. Thanks for pointing that out. On a usability note, it seems that the "Custom" dialog is sufficient for creating any repeating event - the other repeat categories feel a little redundant. Functionality is there, though, so I'm satisfied. Thanks for the quick response.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•15 years ago
|
Resolution: FIXED → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•