Closed Bug 591101 Opened 14 years ago Closed 13 years ago

bholley testing bug for git-bz

Categories

(Core :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: bholley, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 21 obsolete files)

3.62 KB, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
816 bytes, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
265 bytes, patch
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
I've changed the QA contact - if anybody gets bugmail from this, please let me know and I'll figure out how to stop spamming you.
Attached patch test patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Trying it out

Review: bobbyholley+bmo@gmail.com
Attachment #469697 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Attachment #469697 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Attached patch try 2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
trying again.
Attached patch try 3 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Third time's the charm
Attachment #469700 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Attached patch colon test (obsolete) — Splinter Review
This is to see if I can flag for :bholley
Attachment #469703 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Attached patch final test (obsolete) — Splinter Review
This test involves selecting multiple reviewers, selecting a super-reviewer, and mixing colon notation with regular bugmails.

If you get flagged for review by this, it means I can flag for review when pushing to bugzilla! Oh happy day.
Attachment #469704 - Flags: superreview?(dholbert)
Attachment #469704 - Flags: review?(joe)
Attachment #469704 - Flags: review?(dholbert)
r+sr=dholbert!!
Attachment #469700 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Attachment #469703 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Attachment #469704 - Flags: superreview?(dholbert)
Attachment #469704 - Flags: review?(joe)
Attachment #469704 - Flags: review?(dholbert)
I'll get bugmail for it every night that it's open, since I have a query for bugs that don't have the right QA contact, but I eat bugspam for breakfast.
(In reply to comment #7)
> I'll get bugmail for it every night that it's open, since I have a query for
> bugs that don't have the right QA contact, but I eat bugspam for breakfast.

I'll just close it for now then, and reopen it when I need it again.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Attached patch patch v2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #469697 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #469698 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #469700 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #469703 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #469704 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #470915 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch patch v2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591560
Attachment #470916 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch patch v2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591560
Attachment #470927 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch patch v2 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591560
Attachment #470930 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Looks like git-bz was broken by FF4, so I've got some more testing to do.

Buckle up philor. ;-)
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Attached patch Bug 653930 - Tests. v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #530530 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Attached patch Bug 653930 - v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #530531 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
Comment on attachment 530531 [details] [diff] [review]
Bug 653930 - v1

Review of attachment 530531 [details] [diff] [review]:

overall comments.

more overall comments.

::: content/base/src/nsFrameLoader.cpp
@@ +865,5 @@
+void
+nsFrameLoader::MarginsChanged(PRUint32 aMarginWidth,
+                              PRUint32 aMarginHeight)
+{
+  // We assume that the margins are always zero for remote frames.

test comment

@@ +875,5 @@
+  // margins.
+  if (!mDocShell)
+    return;
+
+  // Set the margins

another test comment

::: content/base/src/nsFrameLoader.h
@@ +209,5 @@
 
   /**
+   * Called when the margin properties of the containing frame are changed.
+   */
+  void MarginsChanged(PRUint32 aMarginWidth, PRUint32 aMarginHeight);

last test comment
Attachment #530531 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo) → review-
Attachment #530530 - Flags: review?(bobbyholley+bmo)
All is well. Re-closing.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Version: unspecified → Trunk
good evening :-)
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
I actually switched that whine mail to monthly, and then stopped paying any attention to it, so if you want to just leave it open that's fine by me.
Attached patch Some nonsense from benoit. (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #470931 - Attachment is obsolete: true
(In reply to Phil Ringnalda (:philor) from comment #20)
> I actually switched that whine mail to monthly, and then stopped paying any
> attention to it, so if you want to just leave it open that's fine by me.

but the metrics! ;-)
Attached patch More benoit nonsense. (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #577859 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch Makoto magic! (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #577863 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch First banner patch. (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #577864 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch Banner patch 0. (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #578692 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch Banner patch 1. (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Until next time!
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
The main idea behind this thing seems to be that we don't want script to quickly
close the window before the user has time to read the notification. Given the
fuzziness of the constraint here, I think we can (and maybe even should) unblock
a little bit later in the event loop, rather than immediately after the script
terminates.
The main idea behind this thing seems to be that we don't want script to quickly
close the window before the user has time to read the notification. Given the
fuzziness of the constraint here, I think we can (and maybe even should) unblock
a little bit later in the event loop, rather than immediately after the script
terminates.
Attachment #530530 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #530531 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #578695 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #578696 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #742575 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Resolution: FIXED → INVALID
Attachment #578695 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #578695 - Attachment is obsolete: true
comment
Resolution: INVALID → FIXED
Attachment #578695 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 578695 [details] [diff] [review]
Banner patch 0.

comment
Attachment #578695 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment on attachment 742580 [details] [diff] [review]
Replace the scripted closing unblocker termination function with an runnable. v1

comment
Attachment #742575 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #742580 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 742575 [details] [diff] [review]
Replace the scripted closing unblocker termination function with an runnable. v1

test
Attachment #742575 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attached patch Element. (obsolete) — Splinter Review
comment
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: ui-review?(continuation)
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: review?(continuation)
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: feedback?(continuation)
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: feedback+
Attached patch Element. (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8663945 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: ui-review?(continuation)
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: review?(continuation)
Attachment #8663945 - Flags: feedback?(continuation)
Attachment #8663946 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Component: ImageLib → General
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: