Closed
Bug 606625
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
MathML 3.0's msub not implemented
Categories
(Core :: MathML, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: jmichae3, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
803 bytes,
application/xhtml+xml
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101012 Firefox/3.6.11 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101012 Firefox/3.6.11 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729) the msub element is not implemented. I get something proper when I use sub, but that's an xhtml element and inappropriate. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. use the msub operator in an xhtml document in mathml. for instance, <m:math> <m:mrow> <m:mi>log</m:mi> <m:msub>b</m:msub> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> and <body xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> 2. 3. Actual Results: loginvalid markupn Expected Results: log n b msub is defined in the mathml 3.0 specification. please implement. thank you. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-MathML3-20100810/Overview.html it is possible I am using MathML incorrectly, nobody has told me otherwise, but I doubt it.
Updated•14 years ago
|
Component: General → MathML
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → mathml
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Please add a testcase using the "add an attachment" link in this bug and set the correct content-type for it.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
attached the requested test case. it's essentially a boiled down version of the URL above. does the same thing. right at the msub, complains.
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
> msub is defined in the mathml 3.0 specification. please implement. thank you. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-MathML3-20100810/Overview.html > it is possible I am using MathML incorrectly, nobody has told me otherwise, but > I doubt it. Please check the MathML spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-MathML3-20100810/chapter3.html#presm.msub
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
my former code was incorrect. this *is* correct. took me a while to figure out the spec's wording. it's not intuitive.
Attachment #485446 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
I agree with you this is invalid. never mind.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•