Closed Bug 606625 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

MathML 3.0's msub not implemented

Categories

(Core :: MathML, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: jmichae3, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101012 Firefox/3.6.11 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101012 Firefox/3.6.11 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

the msub element is not implemented.  I get something proper when I use sub, but that's an xhtml element and inappropriate.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. use the msub operator in an xhtml document in mathml. for instance,
<m:math>
 <m:mrow>
     <m:mi>log</m:mi>
     <m:msub>b</m:msub>
     <m:mi>n</m:mi>
  </m:mrow>
</m:math>
and <body xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
2.
3.
Actual Results:  
loginvalid markupn

Expected Results:  
log n
   b

msub is defined in the mathml 3.0 specification.  please implement. thank you. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-MathML3-20100810/Overview.html
it is possible I am using MathML incorrectly, nobody has told me otherwise, but I doubt it.
Component: General → MathML
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → mathml
Please add a testcase using the "add an attachment" link in this bug and set the correct content-type for it.
attached the requested test case.  it's essentially a boiled down version of the URL above.  does the same thing.  right at the msub, complains.
> msub is defined in the mathml 3.0 specification.  please implement. thank you.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-MathML3-20100810/Overview.html
> it is possible I am using MathML incorrectly, nobody has told me otherwise, but
> I doubt it.

Please check the MathML spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-MathML3-20100810/chapter3.html#presm.msub
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
my former code was incorrect. this *is* correct.  took me a while to figure out the spec's wording.  it's not intuitive.
Attachment #485446 - Attachment is obsolete: true
I agree with you this is invalid.  never mind.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: