639980 - set up releases/mobile-2.0 branch

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

Description

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

- building against releases/mozilla-2.1
- reporting to Mobile2.0 tinderbox page

Don't forget: graphs, tbpl, n900s, tegras, probably other things I'm currently forgetting.

Comment 1

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: add mobile-2.0 branch to graphs

I wasn't sure if I should call this mobile-2.0 (mobile branch name) or mobile-2.1 (mozilla branch name with s,mozilla,mobile,).

mobile-2.0 makes more sense in a way, but mobile-1.9.2 kind of assumes mobile-2.1.

I'm going to stop thinking about this and work on the other patches.

Comment 2

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: add mozilla-2.1 branch to pmm/smm

Comment 3

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: mobile 2.0 0.8 configs

Comment 4

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: aus: s,mozilla-2.0,mozilla-2.1,g

This means I need to update my configs patch to include mobile-2.0 mozconfigs and point to them.

Comment 5

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: mobile 2.0 n900 configs, with better talos branches

Comment 6

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: graphs: now with 100% more mobile-2.0-qt

Comment 7

[Nick Thomas [:nthomas] (UTC+12)]

Comment on attachment 517922 [details] [diff] [review]
aus: s,mozilla-2.0,mozilla-2.1,g

Looks fine when I turn it into a context diff ;-) Let me know if you want help landing, tagging, getting it pushed.

Comment 8

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 517922 [details] [diff] [review]
> aus: s,mozilla-2.0,mozilla-2.1,g
> 
> Looks fine when I turn it into a context diff ;-) Let me know if you want help
> landing, tagging, getting it pushed.

Oops, I *used* to always to cvs diff -U9 til .hgrc trained me otherwise.
And thanks!

Comment 9

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: aus patch: same, but with diff -U9

Attaching context diff; carrying forward r+

Comment 10

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 517936 [details] [diff] [review]
aus patch: same, but with diff -U9

Checking in xml/inc/config-dist.php;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/aus/xml/inc/config-dist.php,v  <--  config-dist.php
new revision: 1.119; previous revision: 1.118
done

This will most likely go live when bug 640044 does.

Comment 11

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: mozilla-2.1 / mobile-2.0 configs, with mozconfigs + tests

* Adds mozilla-2.1 branch to mozilla/config.py and mozilla-tests/config.py, currently with only mobile platforms enabled.
 * However, I haven't disabled the desktop tests yet because I imagine we'll want some coverage at some point.
* This assumes mozilla-2.0 will be a Firefox 4.0 only branch, and mozilla-2.1 will be a Fennec 4.0 only branch. Therefore *tinderbox_tree is set to Firefox4.0 and Mobile2.0, respectively.
* I didn't find maemo5-gtk or maemo5-qt's pf-specific l10n_repo_path used anywhere.  Removed.
* Where applicable (android, *-i686) I hg cp'ed the mozconfig directory and edited. On other platforms I simply ln -s'ed and hg add'ed.
 * Specified Android mobile-2.0 update channel to nightly-mozilla-2.1
* Currently commented out of production ACTIVE_BRANCHES like mozilla-2.0.
* l10n dir/repo set to l10n-mozilla-2.0

Comment 12

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 517947 [details] [diff] [review]
mozilla-2.1 / mobile-2.0 configs, with mozconfigs + tests

Currently running staging builds; I'll obsolete the patch later tonight if anything unexpected comes up.

Comment 13

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: mozharness config changes

Comment 14

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: configs v3: update mozharness_config files, remove #aki comments

Working on a green staging run =P

Comment 15

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

We have a green win32 mobile desktop run:
http://staging-master.build.mozilla.org:8010/builders/WINNT%205.2%20Mobile%20Desktop%20mozilla-2.1%20nightly/builds/2

There are pending l10n jobs from that:
http://staging-master.build.mozilla.org:8010/builders/WINNT%205.2%20Mobile%20Desktop%20mozilla-2.1%20l10n%20nightly%201%2F6

My fourth attempt at an Android nightly is still running:
http://staging-master.build.mozilla.org:8010/builders/Android%20R7%20mozilla-2.1%20nightly/builds/4

I'm going to check up on this in the morning.

Comment 16

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Ugh, there's a mobile-browser hidden somewhere in the win32 repacks.
Tracking down later.

Comment 17

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: configs v4: add mobile_repo_path

Looks like I need a buildbotcustom + build/tools patch for mobile nightly l10n.
Will get good staging runs before asking for r? again =P

Comment 18

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Repacks are still failing without a clear error message, after manually clobbering the build dir.

http://staging-master.build.mozilla.org:8010/builders/WINNT%205.2%20Mobile%20Desktop%20mozilla-2.1%20l10n%20nightly%201%2F6/builds/5/steps/run_script/logs/stdio

I'm probably going to proceed with a followup bug.

Comment 19

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: buildbotcustom: fix mobile l10n branch

Comment 20

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: tools: update nightly_mobile_l10n to deal with branches better

Comment 21

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: configs v5: get rid of errant trailing ,

Comment 22

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: tools v2: fix l10n repacks part 2

Comment 23

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 518141 [details] [diff] [review]
configs v5: get rid of errant trailing ,

Ben: tag since you're the one that knows the mobile-l10n stuff.
However, let me know if you need me to switch this to someone else (or I will if you end your day w/out addressing these).

Comment 24

[John Ford [:jhford] CET/CEST Berlin Time]

Comment on attachment 517933 [details] [diff] [review]
graphs: now with 100% more mobile-2.0-qt

lgtm

Comment 25

[Lukas Blakk [:lsblakk] use ?needinfo]

Comment on attachment 518141 [details] [diff] [review]
configs v5: get rid of errant trailing ,

>     'mozilla-2.0': {
>         'tinderbox_tree': 'Firefox4.0',
>         'packaged_unittest_tinderbox_tree': 'Firefox4.0',
>     },
>+    'mozilla-2.0': {
>+        'tinderbox_tree': 'Mobile2.0',
>+        'mobile_tinderbox_tree': 'Mobile2.0',
>+        'packaged_unittest_tinderbox_tree': 'Mobile2.0',
>+    },
>     'tracemonkey': {

s/mozilla-2.0/mozilla-2.1

Other than that, looks good to me.

Comment 26

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: mobile 2.0 n900 configs v3 - only mobile/

Comment 27

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Comment on attachment 518128 [details] [diff] [review]
buildbotcustom: fix mobile l10n branch

We should fix this (and the other l10n jobs, maybe) to use $mobileRepo-$mobileRepo as the branc hat some point. Doesn't need to be addressed here, though.

Comment 28

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 518205 [details] [diff] [review]
mobile 2.0 n900 configs v3 - only mobile/

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/0c8de8ccbb49

Comment 29

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 517933 [details] [diff] [review]
graphs: now with 100% more mobile-2.0-qt

http://hg.mozilla.org/graphs/rev/1ce8bc032308

Comment 30

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 518181 [details] [diff] [review]
tools v2: fix l10n repacks part 2

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/tools/rev/30609690033e

Comment 31

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 518141 [details] [diff] [review]
configs v5: get rid of errant trailing ,

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/7bf9a78975e6

Comment 32

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 518128 [details] [diff] [review]
buildbotcustom: fix mobile l10n branch

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/rev/0591e2b623ae

Comment 33

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 517991 [details] [diff] [review]
mozharness config changes

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/c1bcec535431

Comment 34

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: enable mozilla-2.0 and mozilla-2.1

Comment 35

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 518468 [details] [diff] [review]
enable mozilla-2.0 and mozilla-2.1

Holding off on this until we get a concrete statement that we want this.

Comment 36

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

I fountdI found out on IRC today that we're not going to be doing nightlies for
mozilla-2.0, apparently. I don't know whether this is Desktop only, or applies
to Mobile too. I don't know if applies in any way to mozilla-2.1.

We'll have to tweak enable_nightly, enable_mobile_nightly and l10nNightlyUpdate
flags appropriately once we find out.

cc'ing some people who may know the answer.

Comment 37

[Benjamin Smedberg]

What we *do* know, in terms of desktop:

1) we do not want users to end up on the branch nightlies, if there are any. We want all the nightly users to stay on the mozilla-central train.
2) We have not yet decided whether to do any Firefox 4.x stability releases, other than chemspills. If we do these, they will be released directly to the beta channel.
3) In that case, nightlies would really only be useful for regression-range finding.

Comment 38

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Reconfiged.
I'd prefer to kick off nightlies and dep builds to make sure this is all ship shape, but we will be able to deal with that if/when we want nightlies turned on, with a few days' lead time.