Closed
Bug 685238
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Get a list of active "old-style" sync users
Categories
(Cloud Services :: Operations: Metrics/Monitoring, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: telliott, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa+])
So, it's time to start seriously talking about migrating all the 'original' users to an email-based username. For the ones that currently have an email address I suspect we'll send them an email and either ask them to change, or tell them that it's happening at some point. However, there are a set of users who have no email address. What is the scope of that? Presumably, if they don't have a syncNode, we don't care and can just migrate them, so it's just the combo of syncNode and no email that's an issue.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → petef
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Definitely of interest to QA in terms of testing the process.
Whiteboard: [qa+]
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
I'm not finding any users without a mail attribute. The search string '(&(objectClass=dataStore)(!(mail=*)))' as a "root" ldap user returned no users. Is there a better way to identify "old style" users than just finding UIDs that don't match a certain regexp?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Hmm, there are definitely users in there with bad emails. We just didn't enforce it. Is it possible to do a search on usernames with less than the standard number of characters? That should hit all the old-school accounts. Alternately, a quick binary search should do it - everything before a certain id will be old-school.
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
You say "bad emails" -- I was checking to see if there was a value on the "mail" attribute, not if it was an actual email or something. Yeah, we should be able to track down the uidNumber where things change. I'll look at that. So then do you want to dump all those uids & emails, and figure out which emails are invalid?
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
I believe that the current thinking is that we're going to continue to support those people through 1.1, but not bring them to 2.0, so it's more relevant for our migration plans. Those are just getting underway, so the cutoff number is a good thing to have in your back pocket.
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
old accounts: uidNumber <= 1122000
Updated•13 years ago
|
Summary: Get a list of users that have a syncNode but no email → Get a list of active "old-style" sync users
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
collecting the LDIF of all old users here: master1.ldap.scl2:~petef/a/
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: petef → gene
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: gene → nobody
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•