Closed
Bug 710347
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Failure in testPasswordManager :: testPasswordNotSaved
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: Mozmill Tests, defect)
Tracking
(firefox13 fixed, firefox14 fixed, firefox15 fixed, firefox16 fixed, firefox-esr10 fixed)
People
(Reporter: u279076, Assigned: AlexLakatos)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure])
Attachments
(1 file)
1.16 KB,
patch
|
u279076
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This just started happening recently on Nightly and Aurora though intermittently. It appears to be Mac only. Test: testPasswordManager :: testPasswordNotSaved.js :: testPasswordNotSaved() Fail: Pane has been changed - expected 'panePrivacy'
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
I could not figure out the issue. I'm still investigating, but skipping the test for now, as to our policy.
Attachment #581694 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes)
Attachment #581694 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes) → review+
Comment on attachment 581694 [details] [diff] [review] disable test: default/aurora [checked-in] Landed: http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/43597e45052b (default) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/dfabcd7f5ecf (mozilla-aurora)
Attachment #581694 -
Attachment description: skipPatch v1.0 → disable test: default/aurora [checked-in]
Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure] → [mozmill-test-failure][mozmill-test-skipped]
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
I ran this today on Lion, 100 times for each branch. And out of that it only failed once on Nightly. Can we unskip the test?
(In reply to Alex Lakatos[:AlexLakatos] from comment #4) > I ran this today on Lion, 100 times for each branch. And out of that it only > failed once on Nightly. Can we unskip the test? Were you able to reproduce the failure locally before this test was skipped?
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Anthony Hughes, Mozilla QA (irc: ashughes) from comment #5) > Were you able to reproduce the failure locally before this test was skipped? It was failing more than once during 200 runs. But not a lot more. I could not reproduce the failure when running the test once, instead of running it in a for loop.
Then I would say the situation has not improved, and since there is no change in Firefox code we can't just re-enable the test. Until we can figure out why it intermittently fails we cannot re-enable this test.
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Please check out bug 671382. I'm working to fix the paneId setter right now. Taking all the failures into consideration, I'll double the efforts with Alex's help in finding a robust fix.
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Alex, do you have an update for us?
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Any updates?
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
It's passing now, but I'm still running it over and over to determine if we are safe to re-enable it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Ran the test 100 times on it's own on Win XP, Ubuntu and Mac. It did not fail once. Ran a full functional testrun with the test enabled, three times, and it did not fail. Here are the reports: XP: http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/c67fb1fc2ea8384105b843e32c18cf47 http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/c67fb1fc2ea8384105b843e32c194353 http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/c67fb1fc2ea8384105b843e32c19d31e Ubuntu: http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/c67fb1fc2ea8384105b843e32c1b4cb3 http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/c67fb1fc2ea8384105b843e32c1c2e46 http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/c67fb1fc2ea8384105b843e32c1ce95a Mac: http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/44fc451c2e6b66b62172f2e13e05b865 http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/44fc451c2e6b66b62172f2e13e05a494 http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/44fc451c2e6b66b62172f2e13e057979
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Based on Comment 12, I think we're safe to re-enable it for default and go from there. Henrik, what do you think?
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Ok, lets try that. Landed on default as: http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/1397c0ccc72a Alex, please check which branches are affected. I assume all of the supported ones. If it sticks green we can transplant to older branches by mid of this week.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
status-firefox16:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
status-firefox-esr10:
--- → affected
status-firefox13:
--- → affected
status-firefox14:
--- → affected
status-firefox15:
--- → affected
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #14) > Ok, lets try that. Landed on default as: > http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/1397c0ccc72a > > Alex, please check which branches are affected. I assume all of the > supported ones. If it sticks green we can transplant to older branches by > mid of this week. Latest run in CI passes. http://mozmill-ci.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/9acea0c923846813ba8ce41994000af5 This needs to land on aurora, beta, release and esr10.
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Pushed: http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/c55ad3bc7803 (aurora) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/e9af10605968 (beta) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/b570a5a1027c (release) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/799e387e806a (esr10) Please update all the Litmus tests which are disabled.
Flags: in-litmus?(alex.lakatos)
Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure][mozmill-test-skipped] → [mozmill-test-failure]
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
https://litmus.mozilla.org/show_test.cgi?id=55632 https://litmus.mozilla.org/show_test.cgi?id=63986 https://litmus.mozilla.org/show_test.cgi?id=15639
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: in-litmus?(alex.lakatos) → in-litmus+
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
An update for the litmus testcase of the esr10 branch is still missing.
Flags: in-litmus+ → in-litmus?(alex.lakatos)
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
I'm not seeing an esr branch in litmus. There are several tests for the aurora branch, but I can't see an esr branch.
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
This is Firefox 10.0!
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
Edited this a while back but seems I forgot to flip the flag. https://litmus.mozilla.org/show_test.cgi?id=40737
Flags: in-litmus?(alex.lakatos) → in-litmus+
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•