Closed
Bug 715892
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
In the Style Editor, remove the stylesheet filter
Categories
(DevTools :: Style Editor, defect)
Tracking
(firefox11 verified, firefox12 verified)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 12
People
(Reporter: paul, Assigned: cedricv)
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa!])
Attachments
(2 files, 6 obsolete files)
1007.99 KB,
video/webm
|
Details | |
17.42 KB,
patch
|
paul
:
review+
akeybl
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This is not really useful, and can be a bit confusing.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
As discussed, we'll change the behavior to a more useful "Find in all style sheets" (bug 719409)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Bug 719409 won't be fixed for Firefox 11. To avoid confusion, I think we should remove this feature in Firefox 11.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
The logic behind this deletion is: - the filter-by-name feature is not useful - we want to replace the behavior of the search field from filter-by-name to filter-by-content - this won't happen for Firefox 11 or Firefox 12 - we don't want people to get used to a feature that will be removed and replaced by something that "look" the same but won't do the same thing
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #590724 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #590726 -
Flags: feedback?(cedricv)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 590726 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1.1 Asking dcamp to review to make sure we can land that asap. But we still need a f+ from Cedric.
Attachment #590726 -
Flags: review?(dcamp)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #590726 -
Flags: review?(dcamp) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 590726 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1.1 f- because I actually want to say "f+ but... ...ideally, we could still keep the "search-on-type" feature even so we remove it the visible searchbox for Fx11 :)
Attachment #590726 -
Flags: feedback?(cedricv) → feedback-
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
I don't think we want to keep dead code. You can re-introduce this code if needed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Paul Rouget [:paul] from comment #8) > I don't think we want to keep dead code. You can re-introduce this code if > needed. I meant I think we should keep the logic AND the "search-on-type" UI (you can try it, eg., when the Style Editor is in narrow in vertical side bar)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 590726 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1.1 So as discussed on IRC, we'll rather improve the search-on-type filter and land it together with the new global search box later.
Attachment #590726 -
Flags: feedback- → feedback+
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
So I run into an issue. With this patch, we can actually resize the right panel in a way that the buttons get hidden. If, in the toolbar, I add a <xul:textbox flex="1"> (after the button, or between the buttons), the toolbar can't get over-resized. I really don't understand what is going on. I need some help here.
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Paul, I had a look at it... tried few things but no idea what is going on with that resizer :/ Anyways I rebased the patch to apply against tip.
Attachment #590726 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #591391 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Seems to work now. Yay!
Attachment #591392 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #591394 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #591394 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #591394 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Attachment #591395 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 591395 [details] [diff] [review] patch v3.1 - better id naming Thank you Cedric. Can I just ask you to find a better "id" for splitview-nav-container? It's a little confusing to get the same className and Id.
Attachment #591395 -
Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #591395 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #591407 -
Flags: review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [land-in-fx-team]
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → cedricv
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/rev/ffaed1950e3b
status-firefox12:
--- → fixed
Whiteboard: [land-in-fx-team] → [fixed-in-fx-team]
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
I will a? this patch once in central.
Whiteboard: [fixed-in-fx-team] → [fixed-in-fx-team][addToFirefox11]
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ffaed1950e3b
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago → 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [fixed-in-fx-team][addToFirefox11] → [addToFirefox11]
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 12
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 591407 [details] [diff] [review] patch v3.2 - id name change + move persist attribute as well [Approval Request Comment] Regression caused by (bug #): Not a regression. New feature. User impact if declined: Confusing Feature will Confuse Users, some window repositioning behavior may not work as expected. Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): on m-c, local testing. Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): negligible. Patch removes more code than adds. Clean!
Attachment #591407 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 23•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 591407 [details] [diff] [review] patch v3.2 - id name change + move persist attribute as well [Triage Comment] It's difficult to argue with the removal of functionality in a new feature for the sake of minimizing user confusion. Approved for Aurora.
Attachment #591407 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 24•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/a8d8390ebb52
status-firefox11:
--- → fixed
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [addToFirefox11]
Comment 25•12 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0 Verified using Firefox 11 beta 1 on Windows 7, Ubuntu 11.10 and Mac OS X 10.6 that the stylesheet filter has been removed from the Style Editor.
Whiteboard: [qa+] → [qa+][qa!:11]
Comment 26•12 years ago
|
||
Verified as fixed on Firefox 12 beta 2 - the stylesheet filter has been removed from the Style Editor. Verified on Windows 7, Ubuntu 11.10 and Mac OS X 10.6. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Setting resolution to VERIFIED FIXED.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Firefox → DevTools
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•