Closed
Bug 736707
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
B2G SMS: Support type-0 message
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Device Interfaces, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla14
People
(Reporter: vicamo, Assigned: vicamo)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [good first bug][lang=js])
Attachments
(2 files, 8 obsolete files)
4.86 KB,
patch
|
philikon
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.88 KB,
patch
|
philikon
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
According to 3GPP 23.040 section 9.2.3.9, "A short message type 0 indicates that the ME must acknowledge receipt of the short message but shall discard its contents."
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
There are also three levels of "don't store" throughout the spec and might have to be taken into consideration together. They are: 1) TP-PID: the whole message should be discarded without further handling. 2) DCS MWI(Message Waiting Indication): message should be read and discard after notifying the indication and/or displaying the message content. See bug 736710. 3) In user data header Enhanced Voice Mail Information. See bug 736710. We should focus on 1) in this issue and provide a way that can be reused in related tasks.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → vyang
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
This change is based on bug 736697, Part 2: Refactor to share methods.
Attachment #607491 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
verified with rev 9ff494dfc9b0 ;)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
1) rebase due to changes in attachment #609252 [details] [diff] [review] 2) now based on bug 736697 part 5
Attachment #607491 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #607491 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Attachment #609262 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #609695 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
rebase due to changes in attachment 609634 [details] [diff] [review] in bug 736697
Attachment #609262 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #609262 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Attachment #609696 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
accommodate to changes made in bug 736697 attachment 610085 [details] [diff] [review]
Attachment #609695 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #609695 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Attachment #610100 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
upate comments
Attachment #610100 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #610100 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Attachment #610450 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
update comments
Attachment #609696 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #609696 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Attachment #610451 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
missing comma
Attachment #610450 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #610450 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Attachment #610477 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 610477 [details] [diff] [review] Part 1: TP-PID sanity checks : V4 Review of attachment 610477 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/system/gonk/ril_worker.js @@ +3035,5 @@ > + * > + * @return read pid and effective pid. > + * > + * @see 3GPP TS 23.040 9.2.3.9 > + */ Instead of an array return value, could this method simply take the msg object and set msg.epid, msg.pid? I think I would prefer that. r=me with that, unless there's a good reason not do this.
Attachment #610477 -
Flags: review?(philipp) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #610451 -
Flags: review?(philipp) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
review comment 11
Attachment #610477 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #612790 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
review comment 11
Attachment #610451 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #612791 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Philipp von Weitershausen [:philikon] from comment #11) > Instead of an array return value, could this method simply take the msg > object and set msg.epid, msg.pid? I think I would prefer that. > > r=me with that, unless there's a good reason not do this. I agree. That simplifies the patches. Thanks.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #612790 -
Flags: review?(philipp) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #612791 -
Flags: review?(philipp) → review+
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/0d4f1f7d050a https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/6dffa132f245
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0d4f1f7d050a https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6dffa132f245
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla14
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•