Closed
Bug 740512
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Simplify modifying talos suites
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P4)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Unassigned)
Details
I would like to manage through talos.json (or similar) which parameters get passed for each talos suite. In other words match a test builder to an entry with info on talos.json. This will allow us to: * test on the try server new test suites or different parameters ** hands-off for the a-team * no special casing for esr10/m-a/m-b/m-r (remove comments on merge days) We can have additional "builder buckets" for try/mozilla-central when we need to test side by side.
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
this is a great idea!
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Any idea how the resulting talos.json would look? (rough sketch)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
{ "talos.zip": { "url": "http://build.mozilla.org/talos/zips/talos.bug739768.eb99eb78e42c.zip", "path": "" } "suites": { "tprow": "['--activeTests', 'tp5row', '--mozAfterPaint', '--responsiveness', '--filter', 'ignore_first:5', '--filter', 'median', '--sampleConfig', 'sample.2.config']", ... "remote-ts": "['--activeTests', 'ts', '--mozAfterPaint', '--noChrome']", ... } } With the current buildbot setup we could have suites in talos.json not defined or obsoleted in talos.json. We could add a test script to verify that things are not falling apart. What do you think?
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
This looks good to me. I assume the keys in the suites hash is the buildbot name of things?
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Assuming this applies to all platforms
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
I would say we should document the possible suites: tp5row, remote-ts, chrome, nochrome, etc... Here is what I see needing to do: * adjust an existing test by adding a parameter ** tp5row would be adding ['--filter', 'ignore_first:5', '--filter', 'median'] to tp5r * add a test for side by side testing ** here I would like to add tsvgrow ** I don't think this will work * turn on/off a test ** I don't think this will work * create a new test altogether ** I need to currently add 'tprovider' for a remote test. ** I don't think this will work Overall the idea is great, I just want to solve some problems. I could fiddle with stuff and cheat: * add a new test 'tprovider': ** trobopan would change ['--activeTests', 'trobopan'] to ['--activeTests', 'tprovider'] This would allow me to run tests on try, but not a solution to get into production Another way is to: ** trobopan would change ['--activeTests', 'trobopan'] to ['--activeTests', 'trobopan:tprovider'] This gives us a working solution out of the box, but probably a really long run time, not ideal. In terms of solving on/off for branches, I don't think the proposed solution works. I would like something like: "suites": { "tprow": {"enabled": true, "tp_options": ['--activeTests', 'tp5row', '--mozAfterPaint', '--responsiveness', '--filter', 'ignore_first:5', '--filter', 'median', '--sampleConfig', 'sample.2.config']}, ... "remote-ts": {"enabled": false, "tp_options": ['--activeTests', 'ts', '--mozAfterPaint', '--noChrome']} ... }
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Moving to Taskcluster makes this pretty easy to do in tree. Not going to fix it for Buildbot.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
This already got fixed somewhere. Talos.json contains all of this information: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/file/default/testing/talos/talos.json#l13
Resolution: WONTFIX → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•