Closed
Bug 763474
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Firefox win32 l10n builds broke since Jun 8th because Win2008R2 check not avail in NSIS 2.33
Categories
(Firefox :: Installer, defect)
Firefox
Installer
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 16
People
(Reporter: unghost, Assigned: bbondy)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.41 KB,
patch
|
jimm
:
review+
robert.strong.bugs
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Last win32 builds in http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-central-l10n/ are from Jun 8th. Tinderbox log ( http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Mozilla-l10n/1339421691.1339421808.29680.gz ) shows following errors: !insertmacro: macro "_And" requires 4 parameter(s), passed 2! Error in script "installer.nsi" on line 923 -- aborting creation process make[2]: Leaving directory `/e/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-l10n-ntly/build/mozilla-central/browser/installer/windows' make[1]: Leaving directory `/e/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-l10n-ntly/build/mozilla-central/browser/locales' make[2]: *** [l10ngen/setup.exe] Error 1 make[1]: *** [repackage-win32-installer] Error 2 make: *** [repackage-win32-installer-ru] Error 2 program finished with exit code 2 Perhaps it's caused by Bug 760671
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Robert, any idea?
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Let's add bbondy since he wrote the patch for Bug 760671
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Is a different version of NSIS used? It sounds like AtMostWin2008R2 is not defined.
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
I bet it is using 2.33 which doesn't have 2008 defined. I bet it will need something similar to bug 668574 to add the capability to deal with 2008, etc.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Yup if it's using 2.33, I just verified and as Robert said, the latest it has is Vista. I'll try to get a patch together today to fix this.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
FYI, RelEng is going to be installing NSIS 2.46u because Thunderbird needs it, so it might be possible to switch mozilla-central over to that. Bug 762218 tracks getting it on all the slaves.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Is this happening really soon? if not I'll still write a patch for this.
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Hmm, missed that it is unassigned so you should probably go ahead with a workaround in the meantime.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → netzen
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: netzen → nobody
Summary: No Firefox win32 l10n builds for mozilla-central since Jun 8th → Firefox win32 l10n builds broke since Jun 8th because Win2008R2 check not avail in NSIS 2.33
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Tested by making a local nsi file and including override.nsh with the change inside this patch.
Assignee: nobody → netzen
Attachment #632012 -
Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
I tried this on win7, win2008r2, and win8 and the check works correctly on all.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 632012 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Hey Jim, would you be able to pickup this review? I don't want to keep l10n builds broken for too long and rstrong is flooded with some critical reviews for app update and about 7 other patches I asked for review on for telemetry data.
Attachment #632012 -
Flags: review?(robert.bugzilla) → review?(jmathies)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
try builds work with this patch also: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=aad2c0eb66ed
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #632012 -
Flags: review?(jmathies) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Verified this locally by replacing my makensis 2.46 with 2.33 and doing an l10n -fr build. Could reproduce before the patch and can't after the patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/798d248adc84
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Component: Release Engineering → Installer
Product: mozilla.org → Firefox
QA Contact: release → installer
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 16
Version: other → unspecified
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 632012 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Looks good!
Attachment #632012 -
Flags: review+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•