Closed
Bug 780554
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Mozmill test failure testSearch/testAddMozSearchProvider | Current URL contains the wrong search term
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: Mozmill Tests, defect)
Mozilla QA Graveyard
Mozmill Tests
Tracking
(firefox14 fixed, firefox15 fixed, firefox16 fixed, firefox17 fixed, firefox-esr10 fixed)
People
(Reporter: vladmaniac, Assigned: vladmaniac)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure][functional])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
2.83 KB,
patch
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This is failing constantly on all platforms since MDN change lately and this test uses a search engine which points to a MDN search https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/ Local error log: "message": "Current URL contains the search term - got 'https://developer.mozilla.org/en-us/users/login?next=/en-us/docs/new%3fslug%3dspecial%253asearch', expected 'firefox'" matches mozmill-ci report: http://mozmill-ci.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/29fc09ba0c8360d637617903a01a793b Mozmill version: 1.5.17 Platforms: all
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure][functional]
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → vlad.mozbugs
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
So this is a simple fix - * just changed the search term because there were no search results in the new MDN for "Firefox" string. * also, in the long term, I would suggest switching MDN with a mozqa page - not a local search engine (because this is the only test remaining to use the modal dialog and thoroughly test the UI and IMO we need it). MDN points to a browser ID login at the moment and I don't think we want to use credentials in our tests (I mean we did not so far)
Attachment #649192 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
status-firefox-esr10:
--- → affected
status-firefox14:
--- → affected
status-firefox15:
--- → affected
status-firefox16:
--- → affected
status-firefox17:
--- → affected
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
The patch will apply cleanly also on mozilla-esr10 branch
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #649192 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 649192 [details] [diff] [review] quickey v1.0 >- searchBar.search({text: "Firefox", action: "goButton"}); >+ searchBar.search({text: "Mozilla", action: "goButton"}); This is not a valid change. The string 'mozilla' appears in the URL because of the domain name, not because the search term has been passed correctly. This makes the test a false positive as the search functionality is not being tested at all. We should change this test to use a local page, or at least to use mozqa.com.
Attachment #649192 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Attachment #649192 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Attachment #649192 -
Flags: review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Fixed to use a page from mozqa.com Thanks Dave for the fast review
Attachment #649192 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #649217 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #649217 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 649217 [details] [diff] [review] fix patch 2.0 If we are going to use mozqa.com we have to update the whole XML file. Just replacing the Url entry is not all as you can see when closely watching the file. Also, I still want to see this test using a local search provider, but that's clearly a different bug.
Attachment #649217 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Attachment #649217 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Attachment #649217 -
Flags: review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
You're right, sorry for missing the rest of the details.
Attachment #649217 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #649220 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #649220 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 649220 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2.1 >+ <ShortName>Moz Search</ShortName> Please use 'mozqa.com' as short name. >+ <Description>Mozilla QA Search Results Page</Description> Same here: 'Mozqa.com search results'
Attachment #649220 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Attachment #649220 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Attachment #649220 -
Flags: review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
fixed
Attachment #649220 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #649248 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #649248 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 649248 [details] [diff] [review] patch v2.2 I will land it across branches now. Vlad, please file an infrastructure bug so we can get the XML file updated in the litmus-data repository.
Attachment #649248 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Attachment #649248 -
Flags: review?(dave.hunt)
Attachment #649248 -
Flags: review+
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/c9cc7d5a8269 (default) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/1227f70eb535 (aurora) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/ec753932eb96 (beta) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/9c64d7f8ff0f (release) http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/29843ea9d97b (esr10)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•