Closed
Bug 827545
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Create mozpool python package
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Assigned: armenzg)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
15.40 KB,
patch
|
dustin
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
560 bytes,
patch
|
dustin
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We should also modify b2g_panda.py to use this once completed.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Mozpool's not on pypi yet, but I've no problem seeing it uploaded. Please add Mark and I as package admins there, too. From our vidyo conversation, if this bug involves writing a Mozpool client library (separate from the mozharness-based library jhopkins wrote), it'd be great to see that library included directly in the mozpool repo. Then users can install 'mozpool', and use either the client or server portion, as they prefer. It also means that we can make non-backward-compatible API changes to both client and server at the same time, and even test that they work together correctly.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Priority: P2 → P1
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Priority: P1 → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #702859 -
Flags: review?(dustin)
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 702859 [details] [diff] [review] mozpool package Review of attachment 702859 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I think this should be in the same Python package as the rest of mozpool - so no distinct setup.py. It should be *the same* project - so no separate CHANGES.txt, no separate README.txt, etc. Just a few extra Python files added to mozpool.
Attachment #702859 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review-
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
I see mozpoolclient-0.1.0 added to the python packages in puppetagain. Is that this, or is that jhopkins' mozpool client? I noticed that it uses the package name 'mozpool', which will make it impossible to install in the same virtualenv as mozpool.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
We spoke on IRC and we decided that is best to make the client part lightweight and not need all other packages needed by the whole mozpool stack. This package only needs "request". I have tested the package and it works.
Attachment #706539 -
Flags: review?(dustin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #702859 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 706539 [details] [diff] [review] mozpoolclient package Looks good to me!
Attachment #706539 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozpool/rev/3d10d9547e73
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #706539 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
I don't know at which point I lost this line in my patches.
Attachment #707236 -
Flags: review?(dustin)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #707236 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 707236 [details] [diff] [review] make requests necessary http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozpool/rev/e352d25b75b0
Attachment #707236 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Thanks!
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: Tools → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•