Closed
Bug 835988
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Strings on Cost Control main screen tabs and buttons need updating
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Cost Control, defect)
Tracking
(b2g18+ fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: marcoc, Assigned: salva)
Details
(Whiteboard: UX-P1, TEF_REQ)
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
250 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
250 bytes,
text/html
|
arcturus
:
review+
Pike
:
feedback+
lsblakk
:
approval-gaia-v1+
|
Details |
Strings on tabs of main screen and Top-Up buttons need updating to be consistent with language in rest of app, and to clarify to user what to expect when button is pressed.
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Can we have some wireframes? We don't have any Vivo SIM to test the top-up and (mostly) everything else. Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Hello Marco, can you clarify what kind of updating? What are you referring to?
Flags: needinfo?(marcoc)
(In reply to Salvador de la Puente González [:salva] from comment #2) > Hello Marco, can you clarify what kind of updating? What are you referring > to? Salva and Guillermo: Please refer to this document for updated copy in the application. https://www.dropbox.com/s/elbek9lye7dj639/OWD%20Data%20Usage%20V15%2020130212%20updated.pdf Take note of copy in: - the tabs in prepaid and postpaid scenario - the top-up buttons - the top-up and balance update error messages - the prompts and notifications - the settings area line items and prompts
Flags: needinfo?(marcoc)
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Is this for v1-train?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: review?(stas)
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → salva
tracking-b2g18:
--- → ?
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 719873 [details]
Strings of Usage application updated
Grabbing stas' review request, and turning that into the feedback+.
There's a bunch of detail here, I'd like Francisco to go into that.
I don't understand the costcontrol app good enough to be sure about all strings, in particular I don't know how to reproduce the "below" options.
Generally, this looks good, though. Some strings made my eyebrows rise, but were making strings in the html consistent with the .properties only. The other was upper-casing the Usage app name. those are cool.
Also, thanks for getting rid of the CSS upper/lower/etc casing rules, that's good.
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: review?(stas) → feedback+
Updated•11 years ago
|
status-b2g18:
--- → affected
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 719873 [details]
Strings of Usage application updated
Simple change, looking good :)
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
Master: 9fdf0d138eb0d9f4a2fde56ad9f7e57d4da074f1
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: UX-P1, TEF_REQ → UX-P1, TEF_REQ, NO_UPLIFT
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 719873 [details]
Strings of Usage application updated
[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): this one
User impact if declined: medium
Testing completed: yes
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): low
String or UUID changes made by this patch: Interface / errors strings
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g18?
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v1?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g18?
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #6) > Comment on attachment 719873 [details] > Strings of Usage application updated Axel - should we be changing these l10n-ids before uplift? Not sure how our l10n branching is working right now, so I want to verify.
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
See my comment 6. Francisco, did you check if all strings that actually changed got their ID changed, and those that didn't change didn't?
Flags: needinfo?(francisco.jordano)
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Hi :Pike, I've been going in deep through all the strings and discovered two of them that we will need to modify, in fact we created the new ids but didn't used them: topup-ussd-button (old one, we created topup-ussd-button2, but didn't used in the dom) topup-button (old one, we created topup-button, but didn't used in the dom). I've already told Salva about this, and we have just one question, do you want us to backout the commit and amend it or do you prefer a follow up? Cheers! F.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Ever confirmed: true
Flags: needinfo?(francisco.jordano)
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
Whichever is more reliable for the uplift to v1-train, I guess.
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Triage Comment: Waiting for either backout or forward fix from comment 12 before approving this for uplift.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Please note telephony.css changed after so it is a merge. I restored CSS transformations but they will be stripped out once the fixed PR is ready.
Attachment #719873 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #719873 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v1?
Attachment #723871 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Talking with Francisco, no review needed for the revert. Just applying and asking for the new one.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #723871 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #723996 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 723996 [details]
String update
Done, all strings re-re-re-reviewed ;)
Attachment #723996 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
Stas, can you give me feedback about this patch.
Flags: needinfo?(stas)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #723996 -
Flags: feedback?(stas)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(stas)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•11 years ago
|
||
Axels, can we land this bug? I was waiting for Stas feedback but as you change my review? by a feedback+ in comment 6 I have though if you could grant me the feedback+ instead.
Flags: needinfo?(l10n)
Comment 21•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 723996 [details]
String update
Looks good to me.
Attachment #723996 -
Flags: feedback?(stas) → feedback+
Flags: needinfo?(l10n)
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•11 years ago
|
||
Master: be0a07f1de0681ec72e23f91ff0862f7bddc53a0
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•11 years ago
|
||
Removing uplift due to all is well reviewed. I don't know if necessary but asking for approval again.
Whiteboard: UX-P1, TEF_REQ, NO_UPLIFT → UX-P1, TEF_REQ
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 723996 [details] String update [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): this one User impact if declined: medium Testing completed: yes Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): low String or UUID changes made by this patch: refer to https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/8599
Attachment #723996 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v1?
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #723996 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v1? → approval-gaia-v1+
Comment 25•11 years ago
|
||
I was not able to uplift this bug to v1-train. If this bug has dependencies which are not marked in this bug, please comment on this bug. If this bug depends on patches that aren't approved for v1-train, we need to re-evaluate the approval. Otherwise, if this is just a merge conflict, you might be able to resolve it with: git checkout v1-train git cherry-pick -x -m1 be0a07f1de0681ec72e23f91ff0862f7bddc53a0 <RESOLVE MERGE CONFLICTS> git commit
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•11 years ago
|
||
Merge conflict. telephony.css was improperly merged in bug 835928. Here is fixed. v1-train: 3ca820b181bf66072732fe4ca998035294a4f13e
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•