Closed
Bug 876333
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Animated PNG frame rate is slightly fast
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox24 | - | --- |
People
(Reporter: alice0775, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Build Identifier: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0fed3377c839 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130526 Firefox/24.0 ID:20130526031046 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Animated_PNG_example_bouncing_beach_ball.png 2. Wait for few minutes Actual Results: Animation PNG frame rate is slightly faster than Aurora23.0a2 Expected Results: Animation PNG frame rate should be same as Aurora23.0a2 Regression window(m-c) Good: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/00b264c7cced Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130522 Firefox/24.0 ID:20130522092949 Bad: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8eebe35aae63 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130523 Firefox/24.0 ID:20130523044333 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=00b264c7cced&tochange=8eebe35aae63 Regression window(m-i) Good: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/2a4461b9480b Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130522 Firefox/24.0 ID:20130522221332 Bad: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/aaa399729ff4 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20130522 Firefox/24.0 ID:20130522221631 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=2a4461b9480b&tochange=aaa399729ff4 Suspected: Bug 867758
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
@Grantius reported same thing in Mozillazine forum. See http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=12883919#p12883919
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Severity: normal → trivial
Updated•11 years ago
|
Summary: Animation PNG frame rate is slightly fast → Animated PNG frame rate is slightly fast
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
This file actually used to run slightly too *slow*. In Aurora, a current cycle of this image takes 1666.39 ms, but on Nightly it's always almost exactly 1500ms. The file itself is designed to take 1500 ms. So I think this isn't a bug!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•11 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•