Closed
Bug 898471
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
support [index] for hash entries
Categories
(L20n :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
Next
People
(Reporter: Pike, Unassigned)
Details
It'd be nice if we could add an index to hashItem : '*'? identifier index? WS? ':' WS? value ; That way, once could put an index on just one hash entry, and close to where it is used. So instead of <relative_days_long[relative_days($day), plural($day<=0 ? -$day : $day)] { today: "Сегодня", tomorrow: "Завтра", two_days_after: "Послезавтра", yesterday: "Вчера", two_days_before: "Позавчера", until: { *other: "через {{ $day}} дней", few: "через {{ $day }} дня" }, ago: { *other: "{{ -$day }} дней назад", few: "{{ -$day }} дня назад" } }> you'd do <relative_days_long[relative_days($day) { today: "Сегодня", tomorrow: "Завтра", two_days_after: "Послезавтра", yesterday: "Вчера", two_days_before: "Позавчера", until[plural($day<=0 ? -$day : $day)]: { *other: "через {{ $day}} дней", few: "через {{ $day }} дня" }, ago[plural($day<=0 ? -$day : $day)]: { *other: "{{ -$day }} дней назад", few: "{{ -$day }} дня назад" } }>
Updated•11 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Next
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
This bug is about the old L20n syntax which was replaced by the FTL syntax in spring 2016.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•