972154 - [Sora][Wi-Fi]DUT connect the AP not smoothly through the "AP Pin connetion"

Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Settings, defect, P1)

Description

[sync-1]

Mozilla build ID: 20140208004002
 Created an attachment (id=626754)
 Refer this attachments
 
 DEFECT DESCRIPTION:
  DUT connect the AP not smoothly through the "AP Pin connetion".
 (Note : BETTLE Lite FF don't have this choice)
  REPRODUCING PROCEDURES:
  1,Home->Setting->enable Wi-Fi
  2,Tap the "Connect with WPS"->Choose the "AP Pin connection" 
  3,Input the PIN "82499082" -->Tap "OK"->DUT connect the AP not smoothly  through the "AP Pin connetion". -->KO 
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR:
 DUT connect the AP smoothly through the "AP Pin connetion".
  ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION:
 
  TEST PLAN REFERENCE:
 
  TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED:
 
  USER IMPACT:
 
  REPRODUCING RATE:9/10
 
  For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior:
 
  TEL:7035

Comment 1

[sync-1]

Attachment: Refer this attachments

Comment 2

[Jason Smith [:jsmith]]

What is meant here by not smoothly? I don't understand.

Comment 3

[sync-1]

(In reply to comment #1)
 > Comment from Mozilla:What is meant here by not smoothly? I don't understand.
 > 
 
 it means connection always fail. 
 
 From the log, authentication always fail and PIN registration with the AP is not successful.

Comment 4

[Chuck Lee [:chucklee, Triggered by NI, Review, and Feedback requests]]

AP Pin is not supported due to compatibility issues we are not able to identify and test, per bug 834114.

Comment 5

[sync-1]

(In reply to comment #3)
 > Comment from Mozilla:AP Pin is not supported due to compatibility issues we are
 > not able to identify and test, per bug 834114.
 > 
 when will it be supported on soul3.5? Do you have a plan with this?

Comment 6

[Chuck Lee [:chucklee, Triggered by NI, Review, and Feedback requests]]

(In reply to sync-1 from comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
>  > Comment from Mozilla:AP Pin is not supported due to compatibility issues
> we are
>  > not able to identify and test, per bug 834114.
>  > 
>  when will it be supported on soul3.5? Do you have a plan with this?

As I know, we don't have plan on AP Pin mostly because we don't have the standard environment to verify the result.

Maybe you can help us by taking this bug if you have the ability to verify.

Comment 7

[buri.blff]

> As I know, we don't have plan on AP Pin mostly because we don't have the
> standard environment to verify the result.
> 
> Maybe you can help us by taking this bug if you have the ability to verify.

what's the standard environment you mentioned? Most Wireless Routers have their own WPS PIN number and STA should connect AP using this pin successfully.

Comment 8

[Chuck Lee [:chucklee, Triggered by NI, Review, and Feedback requests]]

(In reply to buri.blff from comment #7)
> > As I know, we don't have plan on AP Pin mostly because we don't have the
> > standard environment to verify the result.
> > 
> > Maybe you can help us by taking this bug if you have the ability to verify.
> 
> what's the standard environment you mentioned? Most Wireless Routers have
> their own WPS PIN number and STA should connect AP using this pin
> successfully.

Ideally, it should be tested with an AP with WPS certification from Wifi Alliance.
And we got an AP says supporting AP Pin but actually not.
The situation is, as in bug 834114, we control wpa_supplicant as it suggested, but someone says it doesn't work while someone says it does.

We don't have the resource to handle such compatibility issue involving different APs among different phones, also, WPS is not necessary for connecting Wifi.
So we decide not to support AP Pin since then.

Comment 9

[Ken Chang[:kenkai]]

This is a feature. As I know, we don't have a plan for this now and it is removed from 1.1. ni? ravi.

Comment 10

[Jason Smith [:jsmith]]

Not blocking. This is not a committed feature for 1.3 for partners.

Comment 11

[Ravi Dandu]

Ken, can this be fixed for 1.4 or 2.0

Comment 12

[Ken Chang[:kenkai]]

We don't have plan to fix this bug, since it is a very minor feature. And some devices don't support this either.

Comment 13

[Ken Chang[:kenkai]]

I think we should remove it from setting app. Ivan, need your help to find someone to do this in the future.

Comment 14

[Ivan Tsay (:ITsay)]

Ni Howie for the arrangement.

Howie,

This is the request from RIL team on settings. Please check if this minor feature can be arranged in the future.

Comment 15

[howie [:howie]]

put priority tag for future work & tracking

Comment 16

[BMO Automation]

Firefox OS is not being worked on