Open
Bug 97928
Opened 23 years ago
Updated 3 months ago
Address book files should be in a subfolder of the profile folder
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Address Book, enhancement)
MailNews Core
Address Book
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: mpt, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Build: 2001083008, Mac OS 9.1 To reproduce: 1. Create a lot of address books. 2. Quit Mozilla. 3. Try to select these address books in your profile folder -- for backing up to a floppy disk, or importing to another mail program, or whatever. What happens: * You have to wade through unrelated cookie, bookmarks, preference files etc, and have to know the secret that address book files are those with `.mab' in the name. (`.mab'? What is this, DOS?) What should happen: * All the address books should be in an `Address Books' subfolder of your profile folder.
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 103857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Not only that, but the folder involved should be described by a pref (Hidden pref, if need be.). This way power users can share addressbooks among multiple OSs (people that dual-boot Linux and Windows) and take advantage of backup schemes (I keep my family's bookmarks.html and mail folders on a partition/directory that gets automatically backed up every 2 weeks.).
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: cavin → nobody
Component: Address Book → MailNews: Address Book
Product: Mozilla Application Suite → Core
QA Contact: nbaca → addressbook
Also the name of the .mab should be that same as the name given to it in the adressbook field. not the current abook-1.mab ect...
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Having the default location be different seems like adding complexity and potential additional failure point for the majority of users, who have no need to share ABs. So I'm not particularly in favor of this without strong (additional) advantages for making the change. if bug 143451 is delivered, is there a need for this? And if there is, I think this more correctly is blocked, and not the blocker?
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•