Closed
Bug 1000115
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Desktop client needs the ability to amend a contact locally
Categories
(Hello (Loop) :: Client, defect, P1)
Hello (Loop)
Client
Tracking
(firefox34 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla34
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox34 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: RT, Assigned: enndeakin)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: p=3 s=33.3)
User Story
As a signed-in FF browser user I can amend the name or e-mail of a manually entered contact, so that I can update his details.
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
This affects the local copy of contacts only, we are not adding/updating contacts to the Google servers Manually imported Google contacts and manually added contacts are 2 segregated lists. Managing duplicates and reconciliation of separate copies of the same contact on both lists is NOT required (we can end-up with 2 identical contacts on both lists).
User Story: (updated)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Whiteboard: [s=ui32]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla32
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [s=ui32] → p=?
Target Milestone: mozilla32 → mozilla33
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Priority: P2 → P1
Target Milestone: mozilla33 → mozilla34
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → enndeakin
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: p=? → p=3 s=33.3 [qa-]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Is the intent here that the 'Google contacts' and the 'local contacts' appear in the same list? And that the former cannot be edited but the latter can? If so, there will need to be a means to explain to users why these cannot be edited.
Flags: needinfo?(rtestard)
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Neil Deakin from comment #2) > Is the intent here that the 'Google contacts' and the 'local contacts' > appear in the same list? And that the former cannot be edited but the latter > can? > > If so, there will need to be a means to explain to users why these cannot be > edited. I'm not sure about "means," but the intention is that the non-local contacts are going to be marked with an icon to designate them as coming from a remote source.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Neil Deakin from comment #2) > Is the intent here that the 'Google contacts' and the 'local contacts' > appear in the same list? And that the former cannot be edited but the latter > can? > > If so, there will need to be a means to explain to users why these cannot be > edited. Yes they should appear in the same list Please refer to https://people.mozilla.org/~dhenein/labs/loop-mvp-spec/#contacts for UX showing how some contacts have a Google icon (imported from Google) and others don't (added locally). When hovering over a contact a button appears with a chevron, if you click the chevron on a locally added contact you have an option to edit it. The UX mock-up shows currently the option to edit a Google contact but it should not (mock-up bug). The support FAQ will make it clear that only locally imported contacts can be edited. I needInfo Darrin to check if the UX needs to be fixed (to remove the options to edit or remove Google contacts although if this is a lot of work I'd suggest only fixing it during implementation)
Flags: needinfo?(rtestard) → needinfo?(dhenein)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Romain is right here -- the Google icon indicates the origin of the contact. Local contacts will have the full dropdown as shown in the MVP spec, whereas Google contacts will only have the applicable actions available (no editing, etc).
Flags: needinfo?(dhenein)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•