Closed
Bug 1006535
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Web Lit Texbook: ship mock-up for "credibility" page
Categories
(Webmaker Graveyard :: Teaching Kits / Curriculum, defect)
Webmaker Graveyard
Teaching Kits / Curriculum
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: matt, Assigned: cassie)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [resources][2014Q2][May30])
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
* GOAL: create one sample page or mock-up with updated template, copy, and sample design. So that we can use it as an example to discuss and model off of.
* NEXT STEPS:
1) COPY: Matt will edit Claw's draft, then paste a link here when done. http://mzl.la/credibility_draft
2) DESIGN: Cassie, are you able to start on that aspect?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Notes on planning from All Hands: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/Textbook
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
Whiteboard: [tuesday]
| Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [tuesday] → [tues]
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
The old version of the page on staging right now: https://webmaker.mofostaging.net/explore/#/competencies/weblit-Credibility
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
* Cassie I'm going to dig into the copy on this within the hour
* Are you blocked on me getting that to you before you start on some of the design work?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
I'm not blocked, I'll just use whatever is in the google doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-zNqJwwv_hb-B5Lj1oLuImXUB1FL1_6KGnM2m6ylM0o/edit?pli=1#heading=h.9edme97no8ry
Obviously the more accurate that content is, the more useful the design will be. Planning to dig into this after lunch, around 1:30.
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Cassie: use this copy for the design:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/credibility
I tried to:
* Make it more cleanly fit the new template
* Shortened it.
It'll still need another pass or two from Claw, Brett and the group, but it should help give a good flavor for how the page could work.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
@ Claw: Have a look at this next draft version of your "Credibility" copy:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/credibility
What do you think?
Flags: needinfo?(chrislarry33)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
I agree with Claw that this needs a quick "how to guide." Even if it's just something to read. "5 steps for being Web Smart" or something. Does that link already exist somewhere?
| Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Summary: Web Lit Texbook: ship new page for "credibility" → Web Lit Texbook: ship mock-up for "credibility" page
| Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → cassie
| Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [tues] → [wed]
| Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [wed] → [wedam]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8419170 -
Flags: review?(kate)
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8419170 [details]
http://invis.io/JPTMBO4H
I think we should discuss tabs/what the other sections look like
Attachment #8419170 -
Flags: review?(kate) → review-
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Another in-progress view, with alternate solution to the tabs.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
I think I'm happy with this for MVP of the detail pages. We might make some type size adjustments in the browser.
Flagging Kate for design review, and content folks to see if this works for them.
Attachment #8419170 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8419581 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: review?(kate)
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(matt)
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(kat)
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(erikad)
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(clawrence)
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(brett)
Flags: needinfo?(chrislarry33)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
PSD and image assets are here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vm6yjuej96nvp43/AABE8oEPENDCWv5fr0Y-D6Yta
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8419866 [details]
http://invis.io/W2TQ1QQX
Good for first iteration
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: review?(kate) → review+
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(erikad) → feedback+
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [wedam] → [textbook][soft-launch]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Closing, let's file any followup comments as separate tickets.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 15•11 years ago
|
||
Hi Cassie and Kate - sorry late to the game on this. I think it looks great. Only thing I'd like to flag regards adding an "editorial" function so we can edit titles/summaries/authors of the teaching kits under Teach.
This is important for us to be able to explain the context of these kits, and who made them -- often the kit authors themselves don't do this.
Thanks -- bug here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1007351
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [textbook][soft-launch] → [resources][2014Q2][May30]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Kat, I added bug 1007351 to our next cycle.
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
Cassie, thanks :)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(brett) → feedback+
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(kat) → feedback+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(matt)
Attachment #8419866 -
Flags: feedback?(clawrence)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•