Closed Bug 1006535 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Web Lit Texbook: ship mock-up for "credibility" page

Categories

(Webmaker Graveyard :: Teaching Kits / Curriculum, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: matt, Assigned: cassie)

References

()

Details

(Whiteboard: [resources][2014Q2][May30])

Attachments

(1 file, 2 obsolete files)

* GOAL: create one sample page or mock-up with updated template, copy, and sample design. So that we can use it as an example to discuss and model off of. * NEXT STEPS: 1) COPY: Matt will edit Claw's draft, then paste a link here when done. http://mzl.la/credibility_draft 2) DESIGN: Cassie, are you able to start on that aspect?
Notes on planning from All Hands: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/Textbook
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
Whiteboard: [tuesday]
Whiteboard: [tuesday] → [tues]
* Cassie I'm going to dig into the copy on this within the hour * Are you blocked on me getting that to you before you start on some of the design work?
I'm not blocked, I'll just use whatever is in the google doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-zNqJwwv_hb-B5Lj1oLuImXUB1FL1_6KGnM2m6ylM0o/edit?pli=1#heading=h.9edme97no8ry Obviously the more accurate that content is, the more useful the design will be. Planning to dig into this after lunch, around 1:30.
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
Cassie: use this copy for the design: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/credibility I tried to: * Make it more cleanly fit the new template * Shortened it. It'll still need another pass or two from Claw, Brett and the group, but it should help give a good flavor for how the page could work.
@ Claw: Have a look at this next draft version of your "Credibility" copy: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/credibility What do you think?
Flags: needinfo?(chrislarry33)
I agree with Claw that this needs a quick "how to guide." Even if it's just something to read. "5 steps for being Web Smart" or something. Does that link already exist somewhere?
Summary: Web Lit Texbook: ship new page for "credibility" → Web Lit Texbook: ship mock-up for "credibility" page
Assignee: nobody → cassie
Whiteboard: [tues] → [wed]
Whiteboard: [wed] → [wedam]
Attached file http://invis.io/JPTMBO4H (obsolete) —
Attachment #8419170 - Flags: review?(kate)
Comment on attachment 8419170 [details] http://invis.io/JPTMBO4H I think we should discuss tabs/what the other sections look like
Attachment #8419170 - Flags: review?(kate) → review-
Attached file http://invis.io/U5TONONQ (obsolete) —
Another in-progress view, with alternate solution to the tabs.
I think I'm happy with this for MVP of the detail pages. We might make some type size adjustments in the browser. Flagging Kate for design review, and content folks to see if this works for them.
Attachment #8419170 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8419581 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: review?(kate)
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(matt)
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(kat)
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(erikad)
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(clawrence)
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(brett)
Flags: needinfo?(chrislarry33)
Comment on attachment 8419866 [details] http://invis.io/W2TQ1QQX Good for first iteration
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: review?(kate) → review+
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(erikad) → feedback+
Whiteboard: [wedam] → [textbook][soft-launch]
Closing, let's file any followup comments as separate tickets.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Hi Cassie and Kate - sorry late to the game on this. I think it looks great. Only thing I'd like to flag regards adding an "editorial" function so we can edit titles/summaries/authors of the teaching kits under Teach. This is important for us to be able to explain the context of these kits, and who made them -- often the kit authors themselves don't do this. Thanks -- bug here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1007351
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
Whiteboard: [textbook][soft-launch] → [resources][2014Q2][May30]
Kat, I added bug 1007351 to our next cycle.
Flags: needinfo?(cassie)
Cassie, thanks :)
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(brett) → feedback+
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(kat) → feedback+
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(matt)
Attachment #8419866 - Flags: feedback?(clawrence)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: