Closed Bug 1010123 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Improve the stability and sensibility of NFC Card Emulation Modes


(Firefox OS Graveyard :: NFC, defect)

Gonk (Firefox OS)
Not set


(Not tracked)



(Reporter: ming.yin, Unassigned)




(1 file)

306.39 KB, application/x-download
Attached file nfcd-test.log
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 (Beta/Release)
Build ID: 20140506152807

Steps to reproduce:

Test Configuration:
1. Google Nexus-5 
2. NFC-SIM card
3. reader side POS simulator to monitor the presence of contactless card

Test Action: tap phone against SCM reader 10 times and say how many times work correctly

Actual results:

8 times fail to get CE established between handy/SIM and reader;
2 times work.

Expected results:

10 taps, at least 7 taps should work immediately. 
in case occationally failure, the user  need to tap again.
Dimi, in the attached nfcd-test.log, go the end of the file and the last block of logs are for a success tap. prior to that, I did several tries, but all fails, which means that I cannot see any "contactless smart card" emulated during the tap on the reader side.
Blocks: 979868, 989889
Keywords: feature
OS: All → Gonk (Firefox OS)
Hardware: All → ARM
Whiteboard: ucid:NFC17, 2.0, FT:RIL
(clear whiteboard)

This is derived engineering work from bug 989889.
So we don't need to re-tag the [ucid:xxx, 2.0, FT:RIL] again.
Setting corresponding dependency is good enough.
Whiteboard: ucid:NFC17, 2.0, FT:RIL
blocking-b2g: --- → backlog
feature-b2g: --- → 2.1
Assignee: nobody → dlee
feature-b2g: 2.1 → 2.0
this is stability defect instead of feature.
blocking-b2g: backlog → 2.0+
feature-b2g: 2.0 → ---
Keywords: feature
I didn't see this issue happen on Flame which should be higher priority.
Change 2.0+ to 2.0? to triage.
blocking-b2g: 2.0+ → 2.0?
blocking-b2g: 2.0? → ---
Assignee: dlee → nobody
Ming, can we close this bug as WORKSFORME?
Blocks: b2g-nfc
Flags: needinfo?(ming.yin)
(In reply to Yoshi Huang[:allstars.chh] from comment #5)
> Ming, can we close this bug as WORKSFORME?

Flags: needinfo?(ming.yin)
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.