1027028 - Assertion failure: mShutdown || (removedFrecency && removedExpiration), at /work/mozilla/builds/nightly/mozilla/netwerk/cache2/CacheStorageService.cpp:891

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1025913

(Core :: Networking: Cache, defect)

Description

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

Attachment: bughunter stack

found via bughunter loading http://www.decathlon.ru/C-99498-kurtki#page3

results in a windows 7 trunk debug build in :

Assertion failure: mShutdown || (removedFrecency && removedExpiration), at c:/Users/mozilla/debug-builds/mozilla-central/netwerk/cache2/CacheStorageService.cpp:891

mozilla::net::CacheEntry::BackgroundOp+0x00000301 [xul +0x0000000000280E31] (c:\users\mozilla\debug-builds\mozilla-central\netwerk\cache2\cacheentry.cpp, line 1538)


mozilla::net::CacheEntry::Run+0x00000089 [xul +0x0000000000285339] (c:\users\mozilla\debug-builds\mozilla-central\netwerk\cache2\cacheentry.cpp, line 1320)


mozilla::net::CacheIOThread::LoopOneLevel+0x000000D7 [xul +0x00000000002D69C7] (c:\users\mozilla\debug-builds\mozilla-central\netwerk\cache2\cacheiothread.cpp, line 292)
mozilla::net::CacheIOThread::ThreadFunc+0x0000018C [xul +0x00000000002D805C] (c:\users\mozilla\debug-builds\mozilla-central\netwerk\cache2\cacheiothread.cpp, line 223)
mozilla::net::CacheIOThread::ThreadFunc+0x0000002A [xul +0x00000000002D816A] (c:\users\mozilla\debug-builds\mozilla-central\netwerk\cache2\cacheiothread.cpp, line 168)
_PR_NativeRunThread+0x000000DB [nss3 +0x00000000001841BB] (c:\users\mozilla\debug-builds\mozilla-central\nsprpub\pr\src\threads\combined\pruthr.c, line 397)
pr_root+0x00000019 [nss3 +0x000000000016E669] (c:\users\mozilla\debug-builds\mozilla-central\nsprpub\pr\src\md\windows\w95thred.c, line 90)
beginthreadex+0x000001A1 [MSVCR110D +0x000000000005B811]
endthreadex+0x00000171 [MSVCR110D +0x000000000005B9E1]
BaseThreadInitThunk+0x00000012 [kernel32 +0x000000000004ED6C]
RtlInitializeExceptionChain+0x000000EF [ntdll +0x000000000006377B]
RtlInitializeExceptionChain+0x000000C2 [ntdll +0x000000000006374E]

Comment 1

[Carsten Book [:Tomcat]]

mccr8: do you know if this is the right component for this bug ? Not even sure if this is a security bug or not

Comment 2

[Bob Clary [:bc] (inactive)]

Tomcat, unless you have reason (such as another bug with the same or similar assertion), to make the security sensitive I would open it up. I would only file bugs as security sensitive if you have a specific reason to do so such as the exploitability rating or bogus addresses in the stack or registers.

Comment 3

[Andrew McCreight [:mccr8]]

This looks cache-related.

Comment 4

[Honza Bambas (:mayhemer)]

I think it's a dup of 1025913 where I believe I found the cause.