Closed
Bug 1029568
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Software Home button does not work as expected with the rocketbar opened
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System, defect)
Firefox OS Graveyard
Gaia::System
Tracking
(tracking-b2g:backlog)
RESOLVED
FIXED
tracking-b2g | backlog |
People
(Reporter: vingtetun, Assigned: vingtetun)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
818 bytes,
patch
|
kgrandon
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Very similar to bug 968382, the z-index of the software home button is below the rocketbar results, and so it does not receive all the input events it is supposed to received and never triggers a 'home' event.
The result is the search result from the rocketbar living on top of the homescreen as a second overlay (same symptom than bug 1028661 but different cause).
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8445233 -
Flags: review?(alive)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti) from comment #2)
> Backlog for now.
That seems wrong. Re-asking as the symptom are the exact same on than one of the 2.0+ blocker. Reasking.
blocking-b2g: backlog → 2.0?
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) - (NOT reading bugmails, needinfo? please) from comment #3)
> (In reply to Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti) from comment #2)
> > Backlog for now.
>
> That seems wrong. Re-asking as the symptom are the exact same on than one of
> the 2.0+ blocker. Reasking.
Software home button isn't used by any production device that ships right now, so that's why this was marked as a non-blocker. When the software home button becomes a partner-driven requirement, then we can start evaluating these bugs for a blocking decision. Until then, we don't have a reason to hold a release on a software home button bug.
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Does comment 4 make sense? If not, can you clarify your perspective a bit more?
Flags: needinfo?(21)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] from comment #5)
> Does comment 4 make sense? If not, can you clarify your perspective a bit
> more?
I understand the rationale behind the decision, so that's fine :)
Flags: needinfo?(21)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) - (NOT reading bugmails, needinfo? please) from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] from comment #5)
> > Does comment 4 make sense? If not, can you clarify your perspective a bit
> > more?
>
> I understand the rationale behind the decision, so that's fine :)
Fwiw I bet that a lot of duplicates will be opened afterward ;)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8445233 [details] [diff] [review]
bug1029568.patch
Alive is on vacation! Redirecting the review to Kevin.
Attachment #8445233 -
Flags: review?(alive) → review?(kgrandon)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → 21
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8445233 [details] [diff] [review]
bug1029568.patch
Review of attachment 8445233 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Seems to work fine, thanks!
Attachment #8445233 -
Flags: review?(kgrandon) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) - (NOT reading bugmails, needinfo? please) from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] from comment #5)
> > Does comment 4 make sense? If not, can you clarify your perspective a bit
> > more?
>
> I understand the rationale behind the decision, so that's fine :)
Ok, I'll move this to backlog then.
blocking-b2g: 2.0? → backlog
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: backlog → ---
tracking-b2g:
--- → backlog
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•