Closed
Bug 1030284
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Cannot deploy One and Done to paas.allizom.org
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations :: IT-Managed Tools, task)
Infrastructure & Operations
IT-Managed Tools
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bsilverberg, Assigned: cturra)
Details
(Whiteboard: [kanban:https://kanbanize.com/ctrl_board/4/430] )
I sent an email about this and have been chatting with cturra about it, but in our One and Done meeting today Karl suggested opening a bug (good idea), so here it is.
I can not successfully deploy the dev site of One and Done to the paas, and I am pretty sure I will have the same problem with the staging site. I don't know about production, but it's not worth the risk trying.
When the paas tries to stage the site, the following appears in the log:
-----> Installing dependencies using PyPM
Get: [pypm-be.activestate.com] :repository-index:
downloading: [ ] 0% 0.0bytes/2.3KB downloading: [===================>] 100% 2.3KB/2.3KB Get: [pypm-free.activestate.com] :repository-index:
downloading: [ ] 0% 0.0bytes/9.5MB downloading: [=====> ] 32% 3.0MB/9.5MB downloading: [=============> ] 70% 6.6MB/9.5MB downloading: [===================>] 100% 9.5MB/9.5MB autosync: synced 2 repositories
The following packages will be installed into "/staging/staged/python" (2.7):
py-bcrypt-0.3 jinja2-2.5.5 mysql-python-1.2.3
Completed staging application 'oneanddone-dev'
Get: [pypm-free.activestate.com] jinja2 2.5.5
error: Can't install jinja2-2.5.5: HTTP Error 400: Bad Request
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
i chatted with some folks at activestate this morning about this and it sounds like there may be an issue (on their end) with the jinja2 package. they're looking into that.
in the mean time, if you change your requirements from pypm to pip, you should be able to work around this. please let me know if that gets you back on track.
Assignee: server-ops-webops → cturra
Flags: needinfo?(bob.silverberg)
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [kanban:https://kanbanize.com/ctrl_board/4/430]
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Using pip does allow the site to stage, so that's fine for me. I'm not sure if pypm is preferred for some reason, but if not you could consider the issue resolved from my point of view.
Flags: needinfo?(bob.silverberg)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
nope, pypm is not preferred. in fact, i would argue pip is preferred since it's community managed. marking as r/fixed now that you're back on track :)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•