Closed
Bug 1030576
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Broken link to "ContractID"
Categories
(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: Add-ons, defect, P5)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: franzks, Assigned: wbamberg)
References
()
Details
:: Developer Documentation Request
Request Type: Correction
Gecko Version: unspecified
Technical Contact:
:: Details
Reading this article: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Components.classes The first sentence, the link to ContractID which is https://developer.mozilla.org/en/ContractID leads to a 404.
It suggested a search, the first result was this link: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM/Reference/Interface/nsIClassInfo/contractID
In that link, it points to: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/XPCOM_Interface_Reference/nsIClassInfo#Attributes
Which I found was also broken.
I would like to add that once I got to this 404, clicking on "File a bug" also didn't work. So that's another bug.
(In reply to Greg from comment #1)
> I would like to add that once I got to this 404, clicking on "File a bug"
> also didn't work. So that's another bug.
(That's using Firefox 32.0 beta1).
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Redirected https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM/Reference/Interface/nsIClassInfo/contractID to
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Tech/XPCOM/Reference/Interface/nsIClassInfo
Assignee: eshepherd → wbamberg
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Component: MDN User Docs → Add-ons
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Thanks Florian! However, it's not very clear in the new link what a ContractID is (to me), why it's needed, and what the point of it is given there's another "ClassID".
Also, what are the built-in ContractIDs? Why is there also a "Service" providers list and why are three (or more) of these types of "IDs" necessary? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/JavaScript_code_modules/Services.jsm
Also, when is mozilla going to get rid of ContractIDs, ClassIDs, Services, etc. and just have a single class metaphor like NodeJS does it?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•