Closed
Bug 103430
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
move testserver into mozilla/tools as an optional tool and then remove it from there
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Core
Networking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.2a1
People
(Reporter: darin.moz, Assigned: philor)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
51.28 KB,
patch
|
jduell.mcbugs
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
in an effort to reduce the required checkout size, i think testserver should probably be moved to mozilla/tools as an optional tool.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Yeah. Can we get someone to just copy/move the cvs files in the repository so that we keep the history?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
perhaps myk could help with this?
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
What is testserver, what does it do, where is it at now?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
mozilla/netwerk/testserver is a simple HTTP server written in Java that can be customized to send back any HTTP response. it is a useful tool for debugging HTTP networking problems.
Reporter | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Severity: normal → trivial
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
catch myk! ;-)
Assignee: darin → myk
Component: Networking → Server Operations
Product: Browser → mozilla.org
QA Contact: benc → justdave
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Version: Trunk → other
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Note that we can't remove these from the previous location without breaking existing cvs checkouts. It would need to be copied, then use "cvs remove" on the remaining files in the old location.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
btw, I have a good procedure down for doing this stuff, and I can take care of it, but I'm not sure who the appropriate people are to approve this sort of thing for this particular chunk of code, and I'm not going to do it without someone in a position of authority saying it's okay. :) Does that happen to be Darin? :)
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
yes, you have module owner approval from me for this. thanks!
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Directory copy has been completed. The directory at the new location exists only on the trunk (not on any branches) and will need to be rebranched if you need it on a branch. It will still need to be cvs deleted from the old location if you want it gone from there. (cvs delete all of the files within the directories, don't worry about the directories themselves, they'll go away with -P on a checkout.
Assignee: myk → darin
Updated•19 years ago
|
Component: Server Operations → Networking
Product: mozilla.org → Core
QA Contact: justdave → benc
Version: other → Trunk
Reporter | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee: darin → nobody
QA Contact: benc → networking
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
Nice - I was thinking about removing it from tools/, since at this point there's next to no chance of anyone using a Java test server that's been abandoned for nine years when they could use a JavaScript server that's actively developed and tested, when lo and behold, I find *another* copy of it in netwerk/! Guess that "reduce the checkout size" thing didn't quite work out.
Assignee: nobody → philringnalda
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Summary: move testserver into mozilla/tools as an optional tool → move testserver into mozilla/tools as an optional tool and then remove it from there
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
Two for the price of zero.
Attachment #382221 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
(Pretend I removed the line in toolkit/toolkit-makefiles.sh _before_ I qdiffed, instead of after.)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #382221 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #382221 -
Flags: review?(cbiesinger)
Attachment #382221 -
Flags: review+
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 382221 [details] [diff] [review] rm Boris, So this patch just finally deletes an entire directory of code that Darin agreed to purge years ago. Tested the patch, it works fine. Figure it's not worth bothering biesi on this, unless you're not comfortable approving. Seems pretty clear this is dead code...
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #382221 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky) → superreview+
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 382221 [details] [diff] [review] rm Sure, especially since the JS test server actually does allow arbitrary responses now.
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
CC-ing waldo just in case he knows of any reason why we'd keep this. But I doubt it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7a93c28158e7
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.2a1
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•