Closed
Bug 103483
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
nsWellFormedDTD::CanParse() doesn't recognise any xml file
Categories
(Core :: DOM: HTML Parser, defect)
Core
DOM: HTML Parser
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bbaetz, Assigned: dbaron)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
852 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This change was made as part of the doctype fixes dbaron did a couple of weeks ago (see url field for bonsai log). Previously, we returned eValidDetect if "<?xml " was in the buffer, and also set the mimetype if we didn't have one. This has changed to only return eValidDetect if "<?xml " was in the buffer _and_ we don't have a mimetype. This breaks the display of .svg documents (on the branch) bz came up with a patch which I'll attach, basically restoring the original behaviour. This fixes the problem for me. I think that this is valid, since if we get here then we registered the type in nsContentDLF (as svg has done on the branch). Is that correct?
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Without this patch, we get NS_ERROR_HTMLPARSER_UNRESOLVEDDTD returned from the document load.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
We shouldn't be sniffing the content of documents when we have a mime type, ever. That's just wrong. What's the mime type for SVG? Can't you just make the parser recognize that?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
But we're not sniffing, and I agree that we shouldn't be. The appropriate mime type has been added to nsContentDLF.cpp (registering us from the category manager), and we're called from within nsSVGDocument.cpp. By the time we're inside the parser, we've already decided that we know something about the file type, haven't we? The patch just says: "The dtd can be used on files that I know about, if they are XML". The other option is to just add SVG to the list of mimetypes above, I guess. But I'm trying to avoid having: #ifdef MOZ_SVG || foo(SVGMimetype) #endif scattered all over the tree. I'll admit that I'm largely failing, though.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Can you prove that this patch will never cause us to do sniffing of a known mime type?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
OK, after talking with dbaron, I've just added svg to the list of known parsable mimetypes on the SVG branch. marking fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
daniele confirmed that this fixed it on the branch, but doesn't have canedit perms on bugzilla. Marking VERIFIED.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•