Closed
Bug 1035453
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[B2G][Camera] Pressing home does not function in the lockscreen camera with passcode lock enabled
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System::Window Mgmt, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:2.0+, b2g-v1.4 unaffected, b2g-v2.0 verified, b2g-v2.1 verified)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
b2g-v1.4 | --- | unaffected |
b2g-v2.0 | --- | verified |
b2g-v2.1 | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: astole, Assigned: gduan)
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [273MB-Flame-Support][p=2])
Attachments
(4 files)
After taking a few pictures from the lockscreen with a passcode enabled, pressing the home button does not function. This issue does not occur if there is no passcode enabled and is easier to get to occur if multiple pictures are taken. Repro Steps: 1) Update a Flame to BuildID: 20140707000200 2) Enable a passcode in the Settings app 3) Lock the screen 4) From the lockscreen, select the camera 5) Take multiple pictures 6) Press the home button Actual: Pressing the home button does not return the device to the lockscreen Expected: Pressing the home button returns the device to the lockscreen 2.0 Environmental Variables: Device: Flame 2.0 BuildID: 20140707000200 Gaia: ef67af27dff3130d41a9139d6ae7ed640c34d922 Gecko: f53099796238 Version: 32.0a2 Firmware Version: v122 Repro frequency: 100% See attached: logcat
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?]
Flags: needinfo?(astole)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(pbylenga)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Adding qawanted to do the branch checks with a flame device with memory set to 273mb.
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
This bug repro's on: Flame 2.1 Master, Flame 2.0 Actual Results: With Mem set to 273, taking a few pictures on the lockscreen camera with passcode enabled, then pressing the home button does not allow the user to leave the camera app. Environmental Variables: Device: Flame Master Build ID: 20140708061447 Gaia: 740faa5d0060fb218b407cf224330654ddf833a5 Gecko: 8bfe3372f848 Version: 33.0a1 (Master) Firmware Version: v122 ----------------------------------------------- Environmental Variables: Device: Flame 2.0 Build ID: 20140708071430 Gaia: 444efc47370736a7bc57cc72a1ec00f3cc5f7e92 Gecko: c3683c06f6d8 Version: 32.0a2 (2.0) Firmware Version: v122 ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- This bug does NOT repro on: Flame 1.4 Actual Result: At 273mb, the user can still exit the lockscreen camera with the passcode on. Environmental Variables: Device: Flame 1.4 Build ID: 20140708070432 Gaia: 229864ff4ad90899f017341b9e81ed0b53498c66 Gecko: 7e146a1d7542 Version: 30.0 (1.4) Firmware Version: v122
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?]
status-b2g-v1.4:
--- → unaffected
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → affected
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → affected
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Keywords: qawanted → regression
QA Contact: croesch
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Confirmed on: Gonk v122 Gaia f71bf6ee534275a44ae3e475e9e2a5dfeebbc0ae Gecko https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/e2402e271fb6 BuildID 20140709032231 Version 33.0a1 ro.build.version.incremental=108 ro.build.date=Tue Jun 10 19:40:40 CST 2014 Editing the summary due to the following STR: 0. enable lockscreen with passcode, and press power to lock the phone 1. press power to unlock the phone and tap on the camera icon 2. press the Home button With the above build, I feel the vibrator motor twitch when I press the Home button, but I can't leave either the Camera or Preview screens.
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.0?
Summary: [B2G][Camera]Pressing home does not function after taking a few pics from the lockscreen with passcode lock enabled → [B2G][Camera] Pressing home does not function in the lockscreen camera with passcode lock enabled
Updated•10 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: 2.0? → 2.0+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Contact: croesch → jmercado
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
camera app does not do anything with the home button. Tim/Alive, we need your team's help to see if this is a home button/lockscreen issue?
Flags: needinfo?(timdream)
Flags: needinfo?(alive)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
B2g-inbound Regression Window Last working Environmental Variables: Device: Flame Master BuildID: 20140703005653 Gaia: 634558f376da67281508c5fcaa91a51c447ad49a Gecko: 7b49b12aab6a Version: 33.0a1 (Master) Firmware Version: v122 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:33.0) Gecko/33.0 Firefox/33.0 First Broken Environmental Variables: Device: Flame Master BuildID: 20140703011807 Gaia: 0f27ffb69182a2483a4d0028e3dde50c608fb9d0 Gecko: 2e0c015d861b Version: 33.0a1 (Master) Firmware Version: v122 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:33.0) Gecko/33.0 Firefox/33.0 Last working gaia / First broken gecko - Issue does NOT occur Gaia: 634558f376da67281508c5fcaa91a51c447ad49a Gecko: 2e0c015d861b First broken gaia / Last working gecko - Issue DOES occur Gaia: 0f27ffb69182a2483a4d0028e3dde50c608fb9d0 Gecko: 7b49b12aab6a Gaia Pushlog: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/compare/634558f376da67281508c5fcaa91a51c447ad49a...0f27ffb69182a2483a4d0028e3dde50c608fb9d0 Both Bug 1018283 and Bug 1020917 seem likely causes for this issue.
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?]
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
likely broken by bug 1020917, Greg can you take a look?
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?] → [QAnalyst-Triage+]
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell) → needinfo?(gweng)
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Joshua Mitchell (Joshua_M) from comment #7) > likely broken by bug 1020917, Greg can you take a look? When a single regressing cause is suspected, make sure that bug is linked in the "blocks" field of a bug.
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage+] → [QAnalyst-Triage+][lead-review-]
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] from comment #8) > (In reply to Joshua Mitchell (Joshua_M) from comment #7) > > likely broken by bug 1020917, Greg can you take a look? > > When a single regressing cause is suspected, make sure that bug is linked in > the "blocks" field of a bug. Noted, however, in this case there were 2 bugs, both of which dealt with lockscreen; The window-reporter listed both and I picked the one I felt was more likely, but was not 100% on my suspicion.
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage+][lead-review-] → [QAnalyst-Triage+][lead-review+]
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Greg, SecureWindowManager should kill the active SecureWindow when press home. I think the proper solution is let SecureWindowManager catch home event before LockscreenWindowManager.
Flags: needinfo?(alive)
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
George will help.
Flags: needinfo?(timdream)
Flags: needinfo?(gweng)
Flags: needinfo?(gduan)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → gduan
Flags: needinfo?(gduan)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8453609 [details] [review] PR to master Hi Alive, could you help me to review it? We'll not unregister home event when suspendEvents in this commit.
Attachment #8453609 -
Flags: review?(alive)
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8453609 [details] [review] PR to master See github
Attachment #8453609 -
Flags: review?(alive)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8453609 [details] [review] PR to master Hi Greg, the bug is due to secure_window_manager cannot get home event and do kill app, so I add a home eventListener. However, based on current design, secure_window_manager will unregister all events after getting secure-modeoff, and reregister it when secure-modeon. Then the home event will be occupied by lockscreen. In case of that, I think we don't need to unregister home event in secure_window. I suggest to remove resume and suspend methods. Please let me know your concern. Thanks.
Attachment #8453609 -
Flags: feedback?(gweng)
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8453609 [details] [review] PR to master I don't know why you removed all mode-on and mode-off code, rather than just treat the home event as a special case. If there is a event handler register, to remove it when your class instance got suspend is a basic principle for me. Please give the detail reason for to remove the whole code if you have to do that, thanks.
Attachment #8453609 -
Flags: feedback?(gweng)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Component: Gaia::Camera → Gaia::System::Window Mgmt
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Alive, As offline discussed with Greg, there should be no difference to keep or remove suspend events, however, like the reason in comment 16, we should remain event suspender as a basic principle. My latest commit has removed all the modeon and modeoff related code. May I have your decision for proper solution to fix this bug? Thanks.
Flags: needinfo?(gduan)
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
Well, as I said in the offline discussion, since Alive is the major System maintainer, his opinion and principle is with higher priority than mine. So to follow the conclusion you have discussed is fine. What I addressed is the discussion wasn't on Bugzilla, so there is no obvious reason why the code need to be removed, which as a reviewer I ought to know, or the reviewing would be blocked.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [273MB-Flame-Support] → [273MB-Flame-Support][p=2]
Target Milestone: --- → 2.0 S6 (18july)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8453609 -
Flags: review?(alive)
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
One of my goal is make window-managers could be inherited by some base-window-manager class so I wanna to reduce the difference. If removing the on/off part doesn't harm then let's go.
Flags: needinfo?(alive)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8453609 -
Flags: review?(alive) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks, merge to master https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/ff14c22cf4d1f13903df720b262d917d596ddece
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 22•10 years ago
|
||
v2.0: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/c07e2d88ec49691f92c3ad552f1c2b3a6098c76e
Comment 23•10 years ago
|
||
Reverted for Gaia unit test failures. v2.0: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/62fc6e67d31e25809973cefeb3dddb094139945f https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=43842282&tree=Mozilla-Aurora
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(gduan)
Keywords: branch-patch-needed
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•10 years ago
|
||
Flags: needinfo?(gduan)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•10 years ago
|
||
Merge to v2.0 https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/b60d9535b0d68d59f40b40e8daa5d4b24cfaf740
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: branch-patch-needed
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
This issue has been verified successfully on Flame 2.0 and 2.1 (we have verified the two case that set Mem to 273 MB and 319 MB) See attachment: Verify_1035453.MP4 Reproducing rate: 0/5 Flame2.0 build: Gaia-Rev 8d1e868864c8a8f1e037685f0656d1da70d08c06 Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/ff1100ba2ab8 Build-ID 20141204000228 Version 32.0 Flame 2.1 build: Gaia-Rev dbaf3e31c9ba9c3436e074381744f2971e15c7bf Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g34_v2_1/rev/ebce587d2194 Build-ID 20141203001205 Version 34.0
Updated•10 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•