Closed
Bug 1041771
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Army of Awesome shouldn't consider a tweet to (or mentioning) "@firefox_whatever" as being response-worthy
Categories
(support.mozilla.org :: Army of Awesome, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1039823
People
(Reporter: dholbert, Unassigned)
Details
Some of the silliest/most embarrassing #fxhelp posts are the ones where a conversation involves someone with "firefox" in their twitter handle, and then they get a useless #fxhelp reply, when no one was even talking about Firefox-the-browser.
For example, here's some unneeeded #fxhelp in response to someone's tweet to @firefox_53 :
https://twitter.com/sanjaygouri1/status/491228417753235456
...and here's a screenshot of a response to @safari_firefox:
https://twitter.com/cpeterso/status/488744739156422656
If Army of Awesome is suggesting these tweets as response-worthy (I'm assuming it is), then could we fix that?
It seems like tweets that mention "@firefox" are probably worth considering as response-worthy (and maybe one or two other whitelisted handles), but other than that, we shouldn't be highlighting tweets just because they mention a twitter handle that contains the word firefox.
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Agreed. There is work on making that happen. :) Follow along in Bug 1039823.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
| Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: Army of Awesome shouldn't consider a tweet to "@firefox_whatever" as being response-worthy → Army of Awesome shouldn't consider a tweet to (or mentioning) "@firefox_whatever" as being response-worthy
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•