Closed
Bug 1045117
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Create a qa-approval flag to track whether a signoff is needed before a patch is uplifted or landed
Categories
(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: Administration, task)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jsmith, Assigned: dkl)
Details
Create the flag "qa-approval" to track whether a signoff is needed before a patch is uplifted or landed.
Note - the flag should allow someone to flag an individual down to provide the approval or not.
Uplift Example:
FMD patch lands on trunk. Dev wants uplift to 2.0. Release management desires a signoff before uplift, so they flag qa-approval? to the FMD tester to provide testing and signoff if testing passes for an uplift or not.
Patch Landing Example:
Vertical homescreen patch is put out for review, but desires QA testing before it lands. The dev flags qa-approval? to the vertical homescreen tester to provide testing and signoff if testing passes for a landing or not.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Which product(s) and optionally component(s) should this flag be visible? Also do we we need to make it where only permitted users are allowed to set the flag to +/-?
More info: https://wiki.mozilla.org/BMO/Requesting_Changes#Flags
dkl
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Lawrence [:dkl] from comment #1)
> Which product(s) and optionally component(s) should this flag be visible?
* Firefox OS
* Core
> Also do we we need to make it where only permitted users are allowed to set
> the flag to +/-?
Yes. Anyone can set the ? mark flag. The +/- flag can only be set by FxOS QA team members:
* tchung@mozilla.com
* kglazko@mozilla.com
* nhirata.bugzilla@gmail.com
* jlorenzo@mozilla.com
* gmealer@mozilla.com
* npark@mozilla.com
* jsmith@mozilla.com
* martijn.martijn@gmail.com
* stephen.donner@gmail.com
* mbrandt@mozilla.com
* zcampbell@mozilla.com
* brhuang@mozilla.com
* echang@mozilla.com
* gchang@mozilla.com
* edchen@mozilla.com
* wachen@mozilla.com
* whsu@mozilla.com
* mlien@mozilla.com
* hlu@mozilla.com
* ashiue@mozilla.com
* ctang@mozilla.com
* atsai@mozilla.com
* pyang@mozilla.com
* fyen@mozilla.com
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] - At Work Week, Slow to Respond from comment #2)
> Yes. Anyone can set the ? mark flag. The +/- flag can only be set by FxOS QA
> team members:
>
> * tchung@mozilla.com
> * kglazko@mozilla.com
> * nhirata.bugzilla@gmail.com
> * jlorenzo@mozilla.com
> * gmealer@mozilla.com
> * npark@mozilla.com
> * jsmith@mozilla.com
> * martijn.martijn@gmail.com
> * stephen.donner@gmail.com
> * mbrandt@mozilla.com
> * zcampbell@mozilla.com
> * brhuang@mozilla.com
> * echang@mozilla.com
> * gchang@mozilla.com
> * edchen@mozilla.com
> * wachen@mozilla.com
> * whsu@mozilla.com
> * mlien@mozilla.com
> * hlu@mozilla.com
> * ashiue@mozilla.com
> * ctang@mozilla.com
> * atsai@mozilla.com
> * pyang@mozilla.com
> * fyen@mozilla.com
I have created the qa-approval flag and a new group called 'qa-approvers' which I have made you an admin for. You can add the above members to the group by going to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/editusers.cgi
dkl
Assignee: nobody → dkl
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
OS: Gonk (Firefox OS) → All
Hardware: ARM → All
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
David - Could you allow the qa-approval flag to be set to particular QA as well? I saw that the flag currently does allow someone to flag ?/+/- for a patch, but it doesn't allow you to flag a particular individual down.
Flags: needinfo?(dkl)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] - At Work Week, Slow to Respond from comment #4)
> David - Could you allow the qa-approval flag to be set to particular QA as
> well? I saw that the flag currently does allow someone to flag ?/+/- for a
> patch, but it doesn't allow you to flag a particular individual down.
Yep. Should be good now.
dkl
Flags: needinfo?(dkl)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•