Closed Bug 104526 Opened 24 years ago Closed 24 years ago

tablerows are not under each other but there is space between them

Categories

(Core :: Layout: Tables, defect)

x86
Windows 2000
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

VERIFIED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: jonashartmann, Assigned: karnaze)

References

()

Details

From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011011 BuildID: 2001101117 this page worked fine in version 0.94 - it also works in ie 5.0. maybe it is not the best (style - cause it is mixed) html - but it should be readable. i tried both strict and loose dtd this time. - no one works - open page in Moz 0.94(first build id) or in IE to view how it should look. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. go to weburl 2. take a look at the page - open it also in other version (0.94) or IE 5.0(5.5 should work - 6.0 i dont care) Actual Results: doesnt align each tr under tr... (there is no hight given by table tag so) Expected Results: should align each tr under each next one in one
dup of bug 22274. It seems there might be a new trend of assigning these bugs to evangelism instead (see bug 81698).
Got private email from whom I believe is reporter: ---- " Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 19:12:10 +0200 To: dark@c2i.net From: Jonas Hartmann <kontakt@jonas-hartmann.com> Subject: hmm... i fixed the problem by removing the URI of the lose.dtd ... but it should work anyway - it is validated by html validator as 4.01 trans html now. " ---- Reloading the page again, the DTD is now modified and there are no longer gaps between images. Resolving as WFM. Regarding your comment: The document would validate as such - it isn't invalid usage, but the w3c validatior doesn't guess an authors design intentions.. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22274 for details.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
From the above comments it seems to be invalid bug..
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
must have been my mistake, html 4.01 document works fine - and it is html 4.01 as well afaik and not xhtml 1.0. sorry.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.