Created attachment 8470350 [details] logcat-FXA.txt Description: If the player inputs an invalid email address, they are not given any kind of notification that the address is invalid, or that the confirmation email was not delivered. The user may not realize that the address wasn't valid, and wait for the email to be received, or repeatedly try to resend the email without any feedback. As long as there is a '@' symbol somewhere in the middle of the address, it is accepted. Repro Steps: 1) Update a Flame to 20140808040304 2) Navigate to Firefox Accounts in Settings 3) Input an invalid email address (such as 'a@a') 4) Input a Year of Birth and Password, then send the Confirmation Email. Actual: User progresses through account creation, but never receives any indication that the email is not valid. Expected: User is notified the email is invalid. Environmental Variables: Device: Flame Master Build ID: 20140808040304 Gaia: c45627132ae7f00026e361a14d5d084a1236af24 Gecko: 18f408a5984e Version: 34.0a1 (Master) Firmware Version: v123 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:34.0) Gecko/34.0 Firefox/34.0 Keywords: Email, FxA, Firefox Account, Validation, Invalid, Confirmation Repro frequency: 100% See attached: screenshot, logcat
Created attachment 8470352 [details] FxA_Screenshot.png This issue DOES occur on Flame 2.0 at 319MB and 512MB, as well as Flame 2.1 at 319MB and 512MB. Email address is not validated. Environmental Variables: Device: Flame 2.0 Build ID: 20140808000201 Gaia: 8d4599d18fbfc41f88ea494ab9cce0bb99cffac3 Gecko: aad73d079368 Version: 32.0 (2.0) Firmware Version: v123 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:32.0) Gecko/32.0 Firefox/32.0
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?]
I know some areas do an email validation check. Marcia, does this belong with FXA or Email component? And looking for your input on nomination.
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?] → [QAnalyst-Triage+]
Flags: needinfo?(pbylenga) → needinfo?(mozillamarcia.knous)
Adding No-Jun to NI as he owns this area for FX Accounts.
Flags: needinfo?(mozillamarcia.knous) → needinfo?(npark)
Similiar bugs has been raised before, but at the time those were marked as WONTFIX because our engineering resources were limited. (And email address of format abc@cdf is technically valid) See bug 1007866 and bug 1021434. Perhaps for 2.1 we can take this bug as enhancement request? Adding Jared for NI here.
Flags: needinfo?(npark) → needinfo?(6a68)
We are just using the email validation that's built into Gecko, and which follows the RFC format for emails. Closing as wontfix (only because I can't find the related bugs to dupe this one), thanks for raising it though :-)  https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/HTML/HTML5/Constraint_validation#Semantic_input_types  see, eg, the list of RFCs here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address#Syntax
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Oh, I should add - the product decision was to follow these external definitions of email addresses for FxA. Definitely feel free to ping arog or vishy about narrowing the scope of permitted addresses for some future version.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.