Closed Bug 1054511 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

In the nightly build of 08-14-2014 bugzilla.mozilla.org doesn't show the login text fields.

Categories

(Firefox :: Untriaged, defect)

34 Branch
x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1053398

People

(Reporter: codycrews00, Unassigned)

Details

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 (Beta/Release) Build ID: 20140716183446 Steps to reproduce: Go to https://bugzilla.mozlla.org in the mentioned nightly build and click "Log In". Actual results: No text input fields for logging in are rendered, is this to push users to use persona, or is it in fact a bug? Sorry if this isn't a bug as I believe this may be there to push the use of persona.org. Expected results: The login text fields should have appeared.
I usually use a profile based off a clean stock profile for each individual version of firefox I'm testing bugs with. That's from a nightly profile for debugging and I don't think it's been modded. I do remember some tweaking in about:config from a few weeks back, but I don't think I touched anything in my nightly/debugging setup. I'll create a clean profile with a fresh clean build of the source and post the results sometime tomorrow. Can someone else test this in the meantime that's running linux?
Ok, after testing this with just a different profile, I can tell it's something messed up in about:config. Things modded are prefs for dom inspector(which I forgot I keep installed) and I had shumway enabled to begin testing aspects of it. There were other prefs modded, but none that I could see having an impact on text input fields. I'll test to confirm if it is the dom inspector or what later. Marking this invalid, sorry.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
(I expect this was a dupe of bug 1056083, but either way...)
(In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch from comment #4) > (I expect this was a dupe of bug 1056083, but either way...) Egh, copy-paste fail - bug 1053398.
(In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch from comment #5) > (In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch from comment #4) > > (I expect this was a dupe of bug 1056083, but either way...) > > Egh, copy-paste fail - bug 1053398. Wow, I guess I'm bad. It was some of my work that led Bobby to file bug 1050049 and the timing lines up right too, how I missed that I do not know.
Resolution: INVALID → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.