Closed
Bug 1056377
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
[rbmozui] Mozilla-ify the UI
Categories
(MozReview Graveyard :: General, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mconley, Assigned: davidwalsh)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [kanban:engops:https://mozilla.kanbanize.com/ctrl_board/6/2678] )
Attachments
(6 files, 20 obsolete files)
We want our instance of Review Board to feel "like home" to people working on Mozilla stuff. We're going to take advantage of the extensibility / customizability of Review Board to meet that goal. This bug will track that work.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
/r/126 - First go at re-skinning the RB menus. /r/127 - Switch to FontAwesome. Pull down these commits: hg pull review -r fd4668ecfac74e735c23ccab0b359d5d7587018d
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Note that the patches I just posted are very much a WIP.
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
I'd love to see some screenshots along with the patches as we go :)
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Sure - I'll toss some up soon!
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8476319 [details]
Review for review ID: bz://1056377/mconley
/r/126 - First go at re-skinning the RB menus.
/r/127 - Switch to FontAwesome.
Pull down these commits:
hg pull review -r fd4668ecfac74e735c23ccab0b359d5d7587018d
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8476319 [details]
Review for review ID: bz://1056377/mconley
/r/126 - First go at re-skinning the RB menus.
/r/127 - Switch to FontAwesome.
Pull down these commits:
hg pull review -r fd4668ecfac74e735c23ccab0b359d5d7587018d
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(Since screenshot comments are broken right now, I'll just explain). It looks like the description box is using the stock Review Board colour? It seems a little out of place to me, we should modify it.
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
the "description box" _border_ is what I mean to say ^
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Good eye!
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8476319 [details]
Review for review ID: bz://1056377/mconley
/r/127 - First go at re-skinning Review Board for Mozilla.
Pull down this commit:
hg pull review -r a6c77836943e1729271f5765efbd1731bd6b1e2f
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: bugzilla.mozilla.org → Developer Services
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
This seems to be almost ready to land. Higher-than normal priority so we don't lose track of it.
Priority: -- → P2
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [kanban:engops:https://mozilla.kanbanize.com/ctrl_board/6/2671]
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [kanban:engops:https://mozilla.kanbanize.com/ctrl_board/6/2671] → [kanban:engops:https://mozilla.kanbanize.com/ctrl_board/6/2678]
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
Transferring to mdoglio. If mconley wants/is able to help out, that's cool, but we'll get mdoglio to drive this to completion.
Assignee: mconley → mdoglio
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
We have too many P1s, so I'm spreading out the priorities. P3 -> P4, P2 -> P3, and some portion of P1s will become P2.
Priority: P2 → P3
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
We decided that we will hold on this because the next ReviewBoard release may ship with support for ui themes.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Developer Services → MozReview
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(salva)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(mcote)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(gps)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(glob)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/#review48183 This was a quick experiment with how we could improve MozReview's design. I used Sean Martell's color palette (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/styleguide/identity/firefox/color/) and attempted a very "toned down" look so it's easy on the eyes. I did *not* address font-sizing or line-height; if we think this is the right direction, I can adjust those down the road.
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•8 years ago
|
||
Thanks for working on this, David! Any chance you could post a quick screenshot? (I'm currently not in the position to apply and test your patch myself.)
Flags: needinfo?(dwalsh)
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•8 years ago
|
||
Flags: needinfo?(dwalsh)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 21•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750448 [details] MozReview Request: MozReview: Quick try at a 'redesign' (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod,glob,gps,mcote,salva https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/#review48235 Gave it a brief glance over and it looks so much better. +100 for less yellow. I'm no CSS expert, so I can't comment much on the technical aspects or on the implications of overriding CSS in Review Board.
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(gps)
Reporter | ||
Comment 22•8 years ago
|
||
I agree, this looks really really nice. One thing that sticks out is the Firefox logo - that's the old logo, and I can say with 100% certainty that mart3ll would die inside if we used that instead of the most up-to-date one from [1]. Alternatively, since there are non-Firefox projects on MozReview, it might be worth-while trying out the Mozilla wordmark from [2] as well. Might want to confirm with mcote or somebody that "Mozilla Review Board" is how we want to title this thing. Maybe "MozReview" or "Mozilla's Review Board" or maybe just "Mozilla Code Review". Dunno. Start your bikeshed engines. Regarding overriding the CSS in Review Board, it should be able to handle whatever you throw at it, for the most part. [1]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/styleguide/identity/firefox/branding/ [2]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/styleguide/identity/mozilla/branding/
Comment 23•8 years ago
|
||
Yeah I was vacillating on the title. "MozReview" is the name of the entire system, which encompasses not just the Review Board instance but also the hg repo and, arguably, the Autoland service. Since we haven't significantly diverged from Review Board, it's probably not a bad idea to keep it in the title. So, yeah, I guess to me, at the moment, it's between "Mozilla Review Board" and "Mozilla's Review Board". But I'm open to bike shedding.
Comment 24•8 years ago
|
||
we could follow bmo.. "Review Board @ Mozilla"
Comment 25•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750448 [details] MozReview Request: MozReview: Quick try at a 'redesign' (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod,glob,gps,mcote,salva https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/#review48435 i love the overall look; nice work! ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:19 (Diff revision 1) > + padding-top: 8px; > +} > + > + > +/* TODO: Pull this from our own resources/CDN */ > +@import url(https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,700); opening issue for this TODO i've asked around to see if there's a copy of this on our cdn. if there isn't, we should host a copy on our review board servers. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:103 (Diff revision 1) > + -webkit-border-radius: 0; > + -moz-border-radius: 0; nit: we probably don't need to worry about supporting ancient versions of webkit and gecko, and only need border-radius (drop -webkit and -moz prefixed definitions). eg. -moz-border-radius was removed in firefox 13 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:217 (Diff revision 1) > +.actions.page-tabs li { > + border-bottom: 0; > +} > + > +.actions.page-tabs li.active { > + border: 0; you need a background-color: #fff here; currently the active tab has a faint yellow background ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/js/default.js:9 (Diff revision 1) > > // Fix logout url > $("a[href='/account/logout/']").attr("href", "/mozreview/logout/"); > $("#accountnav li").css("visibility", "visible"); > + > + /* DW attempt at a redesign */ this comment should say something along the lines of "use the mozilla/firefox logo" ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/js/default.js:10 (Diff revision 1) > // Fix logout url > $("a[href='/account/logout/']").attr("href", "/mozreview/logout/"); > $("#accountnav li").css("visibility", "visible"); > + > + /* DW attempt at a redesign */ > + $('#logo').attr('src', 'http://people.mozilla.org/~faaborg/files/shiretoko/firefoxIcon/firefox-512-noshadow.png'); as per comment 22, this is the old firefox logo. the logo should be served from the review board webheads, not from another host.
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(glob)
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51677/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51677/
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51679/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51679/
Comment 28•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750448 [details] MozReview Request: MozReview: Quick try at a 'redesign' (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod,glob,gps,mcote,salva https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/#review48989 I think this looks pretty grand, but I will leave specific comments to glob and others.
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(mcote)
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53682/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53682/
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53686/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53686/
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53688/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53688/
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53702/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53702/
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/#review50436 This is ready for final review -- please let me know if you have more suggestions or changes? If it's something small we should push and iterate.
Comment 34•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53682/#review50516 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:37 (Diff revision 1) > - width: 56px; > + width: 56px; > + height: 56px; the png you've included is 56x43, so this will result in distortion. please update the logo to be double resolution , which will look much better on hidpi devices. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/js/default.js:9 (Diff revision 1) > > // Fix logout url > $("a[href='/account/logout/']").attr("href", "/mozreview/logout/"); > $("#accountnav li").css("visibility", "visible"); > > /* DW attempt at a redesign */ as per my previous review, this comment needs to be updated.
Assignee | ||
Comment 35•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8754059 [details] MozReview Request: Add OpenSans fonts for content Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53702/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53682/#review50516 > the png you've included is 56x43, so this will result in distortion. > > please update the logo to be double resolution , which will look much better on hidpi devices. Updated with svg file from Martell. > as per my previous review, this comment needs to be updated. My bad, I removed that comment from the CSS file but not the JS. :(
Comment 37•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750448 [details] MozReview Request: MozReview: Quick try at a 'redesign' (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod,glob,gps,mcote,salva https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/#review51856 I like the overall look, great job. This would be *way* easier to review after a couple of changes: 1. For each commit, please upload screenshots to that review request so I can see visually what it changes exactly (and review it in RB) 2. Expand on the commit messages with more detail about what exactly is changing. 3. Break the font introduction commit out of the change which actually uses them. It might also be helpful for maintenance reasons do but some delimiting comments around this style overriding stuff, as well as comments about what blocks of style apply to so we know where to check when we upgrade / where to fix.
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/51419/#review51868 Updated Screenshots!
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(mcote)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(gps)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(glob)
Comment 39•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8750448 [details] MozReview Request: MozReview: Quick try at a 'redesign' (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod,glob,gps,mcote,salva Clearing my flag until the commits are restructured
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8754046 [details] MozReview Request: Re-skin MozReview (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53686/diff/1-2/
Attachment #8754046 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: Update the dropdown colors for desktop and mobile → MozReview Request: MozReview: Quick try at a 'redesign' (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod,glob,gps,mcote,salva
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(salva)
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(mcote)
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(gps)
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(glob)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8750448 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(salva)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(mcote)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(gps)
Attachment #8750448 -
Flags: review?(glob)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8750857 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8750858 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8754045 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8754047 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8754059 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 41•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8754046 [details] MozReview Request: Re-skin MozReview (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/53686/diff/2-3/
Attachment #8754046 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: MozReview: Quick try at a 'redesign' (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod,glob,gps,mcote,salva → MozReview Request: Re-skin MozReview (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(salva)
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(mcote)
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(gps)
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(glob)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8754046 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8754046 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55888/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55888/
Attachment #8757457 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757458 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757459 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757460 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757461 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757462 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 43•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/
Assignee | ||
Comment 44•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/
Assignee | ||
Comment 45•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/
Assignee | ||
Comment 47•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/
Assignee | ||
Comment 48•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55886/#review52616 Added screenshots to relevant reviews. I know a few of the commits look big but they're 90% color changes or removal of border-radius. Hopefully we can get this in and iterate where necessary.
Assignee | ||
Comment 51•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/#review52682
Assignee | ||
Comment 52•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757457 [details] MozReview: Update header title for branding (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55888/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 53•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757458 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 54•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757459 [details] MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 55•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757460 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 56•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757461 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 57•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757462 [details] MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 58•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757457 [details] MozReview: Update header title for branding (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55888/diff/2-3/
Attachment #8757457 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: MozReview: Update header title for branding (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod → MozReview: Update header title for branding (Bug 1056377).
Attachment #8757458 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod → MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377).
Attachment #8757459 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod → MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377).
Attachment #8757460 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod → MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377).
Attachment #8757461 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod → MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377).
Attachment #8757462 -
Attachment description: MozReview Request: MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). r?smacleod → MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377).
Attachment #8757459 -
Flags: review?(barret)
Attachment #8757460 -
Flags: review?(barret)
Assignee | ||
Comment 59•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757458 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 60•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757459 [details] MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 61•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757460 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 62•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757461 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 63•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757462 [details] MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 65•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/#review54850 Updated screenshot!
Comment 66•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757457 [details] MozReview: Update header title for branding (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55888/#review55890 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/js/default.js:9 (Diff revision 3) > + // Update heading title for branding > + $('#headerbar #title').html('Review Board @ Mozilla'); I think it's valuable to keep the version information in the header (or at least somewhere) - I use it often to compare what version we're running with new releases. It's also useful to other users when viewing documentation as each RB version has its own set of docs with different features ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/js/default.js:10 (Diff revision 3) > // Fix logout url > $("a[href='/account/logout/']").attr("href", "/mozreview/logout/"); > $("#accountnav li").css("visibility", "visible"); > + > + // Update heading title for branding > + $('#headerbar #title').html('Review Board @ Mozilla'); Lets keep it so clicking this text links you to `/`.
Attachment #8757457 -
Flags: review?(smacleod) → review+
Comment 67•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757458 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/#review55894 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:23 (Diff revision 3) > + border-radius: @arguments; > +} > + > +@font-face { > + font-family: 'Open Sans'; > + src: url('../fonts/OpenSans-Light-webfont.eot'); Since we're distributing these fonts we need to provide the license along with them. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/fonts/OpenSans-Light-webfont.svg:1 (Diff revision 3) > +<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?> How vital is this font change to the new look and feel? I'd love to see some screenshots / some justification for why we're introducing them. What sort of impract on performance can we expect?
Attachment #8757458 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Comment 68•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757459 [details] MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/#review55908 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:76 (Diff revision 3) > +@media screen and (max-width: 720px), screen and (max-device-width: 720px) and (orientation: landscape) { > + #headerbar #rbinfo a { > + display: none; > + } > +} Can you please include a screenshot where this would apply?
Attachment #8757459 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8757460 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Comment 69•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757460 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/#review55916 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:146 (Diff revision 3) > +/* Review Requests */ > +.review-request { Anything that only applies to review request pages should be in the `review` bundle, rather than the `default` bundle which is applied to every page. It might even make sense to put the reskin into its own less files (one in the `default` bundle and one in the `review`), they'll be minified into the same CSS file as the rest of the bundle, but gives us the separation. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:207 (Diff revision 3) > + > +.actions .menu { > + border: 0; > +} > + > +/* Review Banners */ Could you please include screenshots showing the updated review boxes and banners?
Comment 70•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757461 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/#review55930 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/common.less:321 (Diff revision 3) > + } > + > + > + .datagrid-title-tabs .datagrid-tab { > + border: 0; > + trailing whitespace
Attachment #8757461 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Comment 71•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757462 [details] MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/#review55938
Attachment #8757462 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Comment 72•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757459 [details] MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/#review56630
Attachment #8757459 -
Flags: review?(barret)
Assignee | ||
Comment 73•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757458 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/diff/3-4/
Attachment #8757458 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757459 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757460 -
Flags: review?(barret) → review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757461 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8757462 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 74•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757459 [details] MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/diff/3-4/
Assignee | ||
Comment 75•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757460 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/diff/3-4/
Assignee | ||
Comment 76•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757461 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/diff/3-4/
Assignee | ||
Comment 77•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757462 [details] MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/diff/3-4/
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8757457 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 78•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/#review56630
Assignee | ||
Comment 79•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757459 [details] MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/diff/4-5/
Assignee | ||
Comment 80•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757460 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/diff/4-5/
Assignee | ||
Comment 81•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757461 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/diff/4-5/
Assignee | ||
Comment 82•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757462 [details] MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/diff/4-5/
Assignee | ||
Comment 83•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/#review55894 I've removed the special fonts. I've been told by Martell that we're switching to a different standard Mozilla font so I'll let others do that first. > Since we're distributing these fonts we need to provide the license along with them. Dropping this; it's not a bad idea but neither MDN or Bedrock do this and so I don't think it should block. > How vital is this font change to the new look and feel? I'd love to see some screenshots / some justification for why we're introducing them. > > What sort of impract on performance can we expect? There will be a slight performance hit because (1) it's a new resource and (2) there's font-rendering time. I've updated to use this font because it's Mozilla's standard font, used on every Mozilla property.
Assignee | ||
Comment 84•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/#review55908 > Can you please include a screenshot where this would apply? Added; the branding would take up valuable vertical real estate on small screens, and it's only for vanity, so we don't need it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 85•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/#review56630
Assignee | ||
Comment 86•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/#review55930
Assignee | ||
Comment 87•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/60558/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/60558/
Attachment #8764987 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 88•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757458 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55890/diff/4-5/
Assignee | ||
Comment 89•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757459 [details] MozReview: Update header and navigation styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55892/diff/5-6/
Assignee | ||
Comment 90•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757460 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/diff/5-6/
Assignee | ||
Comment 91•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757461 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55896/diff/5-6/
Assignee | ||
Comment 92•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8757462 [details] MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55898/diff/5-6/
Assignee | ||
Comment 93•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55894/#review55916 > Anything that only applies to review request pages should be in the `review` bundle, rather than the `default` bundle which is applied to every page. > > It might even make sense to put the reskin into its own less files (one in the `default` bundle and one in the `review`), they'll be minified into the same CSS file as the rest of the bundle, but gives us the separation. Somewhat addressed here: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/60558/
Assignee | ||
Comment 94•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/60558/#review57442 I've tried to logically move the skin stuff here. Quick note: this *isn't* working -- `./mozreview refresh` is bombing because it can't find the correct path to the `-vars.less` file, despite the first path being correct. ``` raise CompilerError(stderr) pipeline.exceptions.CompilerError: FileError: 'mozilla-theme-vars.less' wasn't found. Tried - /version-control-tools/pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme-vars.less,/version-control-tools/pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme-vars.less,/version-control-tools/pylib/mozreview/mozreview/mozilla-theme-vars.less,/venv/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/mozilla-theme-vars.less,/venv/lib/python2.6/site-packages/djblets/mozilla-theme-vars.less,mozilla-theme-vars.less in /version-control-tools/pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme-review.less on line 2, column 1: 1 @RB_MINOR_VERSION: 5;@STATIC_ROOT: "/static/";@DEBUG: false;@RB_IS_RELEASED: 0;@RB_MICRO_VERSION: 4;@RB_PATCH_VERSION: 0;@RB_MAJOR_VERSION: 2; 2 @import (reference) 'mozilla-theme-vars'; ``` I've also pushed this for discussion of how we'd like to do this moving forward. Any comments welcome.
Assignee | ||
Comment 95•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/60558/#review58454 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:1 (Diff revision 1) > +@import 'mozilla-theme-vars.less'; Adding stub issue for overall error.
Assignee | ||
Comment 96•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8764987 [details] MozReview: Move new skin to its own files (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/60558/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8757458 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8757458 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8757459 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8757459 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8757460 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8757460 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8757461 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8757461 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8757462 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8757462 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8764987 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8764987 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 97•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/55886/#review58622 Closing this because it requires an update that should be made post-rbbz-rebase. This review request got hosed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 98•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63520/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63520/
Attachment #8769814 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8769815 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8769816 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8769817 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8769818 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 99•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63522/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63522/
Assignee | ||
Comment 100•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63524/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63524/
Assignee | ||
Comment 101•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63526/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63526/
Assignee | ||
Comment 102•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63528/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63528/
Assignee | ||
Comment 103•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63528/#review60388 Let me know if this is more to your liking. I can redo the review structure and start the changes in this format.
Comment 104•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63528/#review60388 Yup, separating it like that seems good to me :D
Assignee | ||
Comment 105•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63556/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63556/
Attachment #8769858 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8769859 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8769860 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Attachment #8769861 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 106•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63558/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63558/
Assignee | ||
Comment 107•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/
Assignee | ||
Comment 108•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63562/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63562/
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769814 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8769814 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769815 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8769815 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769816 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8769816 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769817 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8769817 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769818 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8769818 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 109•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63562/#review60998 Screenshots added
Reporter | ||
Comment 110•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769858 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63556/#review61008 The code looks fine, and the screenshots are baller.
Attachment #8769858 -
Flags: review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 111•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769859 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63558/#review61010 Just a quick question about border-radius(0);. Otherwise, lgtm. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme-reviews.less:8 (Diff revision 1) > +/* Review Requests */ > +.review-request { > + .main { > + background: #fff; > + border: 0; > + border-radius: 0; Woo - no border-radius! ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme-reviews.less:28 (Diff revision 1) > + background: @moz-blue-dark; > + border: 0; > +} > + > +.actions-container { > + .border-radius(0); At first I thought this was an error, and then I realized that LESS allows us to [define macros like this](https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/blob/1ddc83098007246c1790d7a1cd9b2c4cdb4713c0/reviewboard/static/rb/css/mixins/style.less#L6) According to the documentation in that file, these macros are deprecated. Are we able to just use `border-radius: 0;` directly? Same for other uses in this file.
Attachment #8769859 -
Flags: review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 112•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769860 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/#review61012 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:129 (Diff revision 1) > + #page_sidebar { > + .page-sidebar-items { > + li.has-url { > + &:hover { > + .page-sidebar-row { > + .border-radius(0); Same as other commit regarding this macro, including other uses in this commit. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:130 (Diff revision 1) > + .page-sidebar-items { > + li.has-url { > + &:hover { > + .page-sidebar-row { > + .border-radius(0); > + background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.6); Worth putting into a variable, maybe in a follow-up? ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:163 (Diff revision 1) > + > + .datagrid-header { > + background: @moz-blue-dark; > + } > +} > +body.datagrid-page { Nit: newline before this new block please. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:218 (Diff revision 1) > + > + .datagrid-title-tabs .datagrid-tab { > + border: 0; > + > + &.active { > + background: #d4dde4; Worth extracting this out to a variable, maybe in a follow-up patch? ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:253 (Diff revision 1) > + border-left: 1px solid @moz-blue-light; > + padding: 0 20px; Busted indentation
Attachment #8769860 -
Flags: review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 113•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769861 [details] MozReview: Update dialog and comment dialog styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63562/#review61014 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:276 (Diff revision 1) > } > + > +/* Dialogs */ > +.modalbox-inner, .modalbox-title, .modalbox { > + background-image: none; > + .border-radius(0); Same as before with this macro. ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:281 (Diff revision 1) > + .border-radius(0); > +} > + > +.modalbox-title { > + background: @moz-blue-dark; > + border-bottom-color: #888a85; Variable for this? ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:289 (Diff revision 1) > +.modalbox-inner { > + background: @moz-blue-light; > +} > + > +.modalbox-bg { > + background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.6) !important; /* overriding JS */ And this too?
Attachment #8769861 -
Flags: review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 114•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63558/#review61010 > At first I thought this was an error, and then I realized that LESS allows us to [define macros like this](https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/blob/1ddc83098007246c1790d7a1cd9b2c4cdb4713c0/reviewboard/static/rb/css/mixins/style.less#L6) > > According to the documentation in that file, these macros are deprecated. Are we able to just use `border-radius: 0;` directly? > > Same for other uses in this file. I just realized you defined the macro yourself in the first patch - my bad for missing that.
Reporter | ||
Comment 115•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/#review61012 > Same as other commit regarding this macro, including other uses in this commit. Dropping, since you define this macro yourself in the first commit.
Reporter | ||
Comment 116•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63562/#review61014 > Same as before with this macro. Dropping, since you define this macro yourself in the first commit.
Assignee | ||
Comment 117•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769858 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63556/diff/1-2/
Attachment #8769858 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #8769859 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #8769860 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 118•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769859 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63558/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Comment 119•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769860 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/diff/1-2/
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769861 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8769861 -
Flags: review?(smacleod)
Assignee | ||
Comment 120•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/#review61034 ::: pylib/mozreview/mozreview/static/mozreview/css/mozilla-theme.less:282 (Diff revision 2) > + .border-radius(0); > +} > + > +.modalbox-title { > + background: @moz-blue-dark; > + border-bottom-color: #888a85; Didn't add a var for this because this dialog will be going away shortly with the dropdown dialog; color is the current dialog border color.
Comment 121•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769858 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63556/#review62676
Attachment #8769858 -
Flags: review?(smacleod) → review+
Comment 122•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769859 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63558/#review62678
Attachment #8769859 -
Flags: review?(smacleod) → review+
Comment 123•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769860 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/#review62674 Looks great :D, just the little overflow issue.
Attachment #8769860 -
Flags: review?(smacleod) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 124•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769858 [details] MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63556/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 125•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769859 [details] MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63558/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 126•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769860 [details] MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles (Bug 1056377). Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/diff/2-3/
Assignee | ||
Comment 127•8 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63560/#review62674
Comment 128•8 years ago
|
||
Pushed by bjones@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/hgcustom/version-control-tools/rev/58ad2f8e01e1 MozReview: Update base site colors and fonts . r=mconley,smacleod https://hg.mozilla.org/hgcustom/version-control-tools/rev/20e40a4963c0 MozReview: Update Review Request page, banner, and comments styles . r=mconley,smacleod https://hg.mozilla.org/hgcustom/version-control-tools/rev/77d80b0b77e5 MozReview: Update Diff Viewer and grid styles . r=mconley,smacleod
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 129•8 years ago
|
||
The prod deploy didn't like the logo.svg change. It was complaining during "collectstatic" that a ext/mozreview.extension/MozReviewExtension/mozreview/logo.svg could not be found. I hacked around this by copying the logo.svg into that directory on the admin server to unblock the deploy.
Flags: needinfo?(dwalsh)
Assignee | ||
Comment 130•8 years ago
|
||
Reopening in hopes it frees up to add a review request on MozReview...
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Flags: needinfo?(dwalsh)
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 131•8 years ago
|
||
Keeping myself as needinfo for purpose of SVG issue if it pops up again.
Flags: needinfo?(davidwalsh83)
Comment 132•8 years ago
|
||
please don't reopen deployed bugs; file new bugs for issues.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago → 8 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(davidwalsh83)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•