"ASSERTION: How did we end up with a negative min-size?" with flex and huge <video>

NEW
Unassigned

Status

()

Core
Layout
3 years ago
3 months ago

People

(Reporter: Jesse Ruderman, Unassigned)

Tracking

(Blocks: 1 bug, {assertion, testcase})

Trunk
x86_64
Mac OS X
assertion, testcase
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(2 attachments)

(Reporter)

Description

3 years ago
Created attachment 8479403 [details]
testcase

###!!! ASSERTION: How did we end up with a negative min-size?: 'aNewMinSize >= 0', file layout/generic/nsFlexContainerFrame.cpp, line 436

This assertion in UpdateMainMinSize was added in bug 1015474:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f5b98d327bde
(Reporter)

Comment 1

3 years ago
Created attachment 8479405 [details]
stack
Summary: "ASSERTION: How did we end up with a negative min-size?" with flex → "ASSERTION: How did we end up with a negative min-size?" with flex and huge <video>
See Also: → bug 1397449
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.