1059311 - 'Open Containing Folder' option is displayed for a canceled download

Status: NEW

(Firefox :: Downloads Panel, defect)

Description

[Ada [:adalucinet]]

Reproducible on:
Firefox 32 RC (BuildID: 20140825202822):
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0
the latest Aurora (BuildID: 20140826004003):
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0
the latest Nightly (BuildID: 20140826030203):
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/34.0

Not reproducible on:
[*] Firefox 32 beta 9 (BuildID: 20140822024446)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0

STR:
1. Launch Firefox and navigate to http://www.thinkbroadband.com/download.html
2. Download 2 large files (recommended to select the same 2 files - it is easier to reproduce)
3. Open the Library (Ctrl/Cmd + J) and cancel both downloads.
4. Click on Retry for both downloads.

Expected results: 'Cancel' option is shown for both downloads.

Actual results: 'Open Containing Folder' option is shown for one of the downloads.

Notes:
1. Reproducible on Mac OS X 10.9.4 and Ubuntu 13.04 32-bit.
2. Regression range:

Last good revision: e2e1b19fcffc (2014-05-02)
First bad revision: 8d591a3f6fea (2014-05-03)
Pushlog: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=e2e1b19fcffc&tochange=8d591a3f6fea

3. [*] The fact that this issue is not reproducible on Firefox 32 beta 9 could be because of bug 1057764?
4. .gif showing this issue: http://goo.gl/dX3NZV
5. When I select 'Cancel' option and then 'Retry', in Browser Console I get: 

NS_BASE_STREAM_CLOSED: Component returned failure code: 0x80470002 (NS_BASE_STREAM_CLOSED) [nsIStreamListener.onDataAvailable] 
[Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80070057 (NS_ERROR_ILLEGAL_VALUE) [nsIAnnotationService.setPageAnnotation]"  nsresult: "0x80070057 (NS_ERROR_ILLEGAL_VALUE)"  location: "JS frame :: resource://app/modules/DownloadsCommon.jsm :: DownloadsDataCtor.prototype._updateDataItemState :: line 686"  data: no]

Could this be related with this issue? Or is it expected at all? Please let me know if I need to file another issue on this matter.

Comment 1

[Siddartha L K [:siddu]]

As my first bug to start up with would u please assign me this bug.