Closed
Bug 1061088
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[Lockscreen] The time of the second notification overlaps with the time of the first notification when generating multiple notifications and taping the second one
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System::Lockscreen, defect)
Tracking
(b2g-v2.1 verified)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
b2g-v2.1 | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: gchang, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [systemsfe])
Attachments
(1 file)
84.83 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
### Steps: 1. Generate multiple notifications in lockscreen. ex: make phone calls more than once. 2. Tap the second notification ### Expected: 1. The second notification should be selected. The background color should become darker. 2. The time should be changed to "open" ### Actual: 1. The second notification is not selected. But, the first notification is selected. 2. The time of the first notification "just now" become "open". The time of the second notification "just now" move up and overlap with the time of first notification "open". ### Reproduce rate always ### Version: Device flame Gaia 2be78d83a760fa3b9638fe51c266b442d14597f1 Gecko https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1db35d2c9a2f BuildID 20140831160203 Version 34.0a1
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: [Lockscreen] The time of the second notificati0on overlaps with the time of the first notification when generating multiple notifications and tap the second one → [Lockscreen] The time of the second notification overlaps with the time of the first notification when generating multiple notifications and tap the second one
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: [Lockscreen] The time of the second notification overlaps with the time of the first notification when generating multiple notifications and tap the second one → [Lockscreen] The time of the second notification overlaps with the time of the first notification when generating multiple notifications and taping the second one
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
[Blocking Requested - why for this release]:
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.1?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
I've found this is caused by Bug 1038723 and it should be a regression. Because I reset --hard master to the patch, and it's still broken. After revert the patch from the master I reseted, it get fixed.
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
I do reset rather than directly revert because I can't revert it without any conflict. Anyway, the build now is without this bug after the reseting & reverting. After revert my master tree now is: 118-168-132-181.dynamic.hinet.net snowmantw:~/Projects/gaia$ 118-168-132-181.dynamic.hinet.net snowmantw:~/Projects/gaia$ git log commit 7ce28c1bfb2c11e15aeb4aae60772293909eaa18 Author: Greg Weng <snowmantw@gmail.com> Date: Mon Sep 1 15:01:32 2014 +0800 Revert "Merge pull request #23153 from gmarty/Bug-1038723-Utility-Tray-Visual-Refresh" This reverts commit be46e59bc351842fcda012f5b8f24b99cd70cc88, reversing changes made to c05ee27dd1f39e0f1cceb8bc7706e20f297cd9df. commit be46e59bc351842fcda012f5b8f24b99cd70cc88 Merge: c05ee27 6aa3b64 Author: Guillaume C. Marty <gmarty@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri Aug 29 19:01:26 2014 +0100 Merge pull request #23153 from gmarty/Bug-1038723-Utility-Tray-Visual-Refresh Bug 1038723 - [Utility Tray] Visual Refresh commit c05ee27dd1f39e0f1cceb8bc7706e20f297cd9df Merge: 01f3265 9543ba1 Author: Ben Francis <ben@tola.me.uk> Date: Fri Aug 29 18:57:24 2014 +0100 Merge pull request #23440 from benfrancis/1058096 Bug 1058096 - Add show windows button to Rocketbar on Browser start page r=kgrandon commit 01f3265b74493d032f52cef8c5ed12810d9be78d (...)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [regression]
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Correct regression flagging. Gerry? Is this considered a smoketest breakage? Should we simply backout this patch?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
This test is not covered by smoketest. It belongs to 2.1 new feature. So, I would not say it's a smoketest breakage.
Flags: needinfo?(gchang)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Fixed by backout, see bug 1038723 comment 37.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
blocking-b2g: 2.1? → ---
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gerry Chang [:cfchang] from comment #6) > This test is not covered by smoketest. It belongs to 2.1 new feature. So, I > would not say it's a smoketest breakage. Notifications on lock screen is a feature since v1.0.1. Jason, do we have any smoke tests about notifications on lock screen? Do you think it make sense to create one?
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith)
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
The touch action on notification is a new 2.1 feature. And, this bug will happen when user click the notification. So far, there is no test case covering the "touch-action" on notification.
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gerry Chang [:cfchang] from comment #9) > The touch action on notification is a new 2.1 feature. And, this bug will > happen when user click the notification. So far, there is no test case > covering the "touch-action" on notification. Right. Sorry for the confusion. So the right question to ask is "should this new feature be included in the smoketest?"
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Verified @ Gaia 7e469783859785a8bd4bf02a802f32561c84be7b Gecko https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/372ce1f36116 BuildID 20140902160202 Version 35.0a1
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Tim Guan-tin Chien [:timdream] (MoCo-TPE) (please ni?) from comment #8) > (In reply to Gerry Chang [:cfchang] from comment #6) > > This test is not covered by smoketest. It belongs to 2.1 new feature. So, I > > would not say it's a smoketest breakage. > > Notifications on lock screen is a feature since v1.0.1. > > Jason, do we have any smoke tests about notifications on lock screen? Do you > think it make sense to create one? Not right now. Marcia & I chatted about this - we both don't think we would include this as a smoketest mainly because we think lockscreen notifications breaking wouldn't be classified as bare bones functionality, since if it broke, then you could still use the basics of the phone.
Flags: needinfo?(jsmith)
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
Verified @ Gaia 90812662b9e0d3aba88882290c08971fdff98515 Gecko https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/9da2a5828e56 BuildID 20140909160202 Version 34.0a2
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
per comment 13, marking 2.1 branch verified.
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → verified
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•