Closed Bug 1069338 Opened 11 years ago Closed 8 years ago

Introduce a simulator to control the API the application needs and uses

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::SMS, defect)

x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: julienw, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

46 bytes, text/x-github-pull-request
Details | Review
No description provided.
Attached file github PR
From Oleg in https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/23766#discussion_r17623378: * We have links to all shims in index.html (that are removed by build.js for device); * All shims still responsible only for it's own matters; * We have central desktop-only/simulator.js that has the following responsibilities: * Build and manage simulator UI in full. Currently I see that it's built by data from several "providers", not sure if need that level of abstraction; * Eg. listen for window.onKeyDown for some magic key combination to show Simulator panel as overlay. In that case we won't have iframe and can use responsive view (though value is arguable) * Somehow notifies mocks about relevant changes in Simulator UI (like Simulator UI (Settings) -> navigator_moz_settings -> call mozSettings observers). Shouldn't be difficult as we're in the same document. * Simulator UI changes can be saved via modifying query params or sessionStorage for example to persist between reloads.. I haven't analyzed code too much, maybe I'm missing the point of having it like this. It would be great to hear it from you!
(In reply to Julien Wajsberg [:julienw] from comment #2) > From Oleg in > https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/23766#discussion_r17623378: > > * We have links to all shims in index.html (that are removed by build.js for > device); done :) (except the fact that it's removed by build.js, waiting for bug 1050416 > * All shims still responsible only for it's own matters; done ! What I've put in "shims/" are really of 2 types: * some are really shims for some API * some are more high level (eg: DSDS) I'd be open to separate them in 2 different directories. That would help making clear which are higher level, and avoid dependencies from low level to high level. > * We have central desktop-only/simulator.js that has the following > responsibilities: > * Build and manage simulator UI in full. Currently I see that it's built > by data from several "providers", not sure if need that level of abstraction; I really like the way I did it for now. Each provider gets a container where it can render stuff and react. This helps having a quite ordered UI, and keeps things organized without spaghetti code. > * Eg. listen for window.onKeyDown for some magic key combination to show > Simulator panel as overlay. In that case we won't have iframe and can use > responsive view (though value is arguable) I don't see how this would work with the responsive view. For sure I'd rather have all this inside Firefox Dev tools :) > * Somehow notifies mocks about relevant changes in Simulator UI (like > Simulator UI (Settings) -> navigator_moz_settings -> call mozSettings > observers). Shouldn't be difficult as we're in the same document. That's what I do already (or that I want to do, not sure for the case of mozSettings actually ;) ). > * Simulator UI changes can be saved via modifying query params or > sessionStorage for example to persist between reloads.. Even localStorage. Each shims could persist stuff locally, or have access to a global API. > > I haven't analyzed code too much, maybe I'm missing the point of having it > like this. It would be great to hear it from you! So it's not really different to what you're saying, actually :)
Mass closing of Gaia::SMS bugs. End of an era :(
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Mass closing of Gaia::SMS bugs. End of an era :(
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: