Closed
Bug 1072010
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Unable to connect to fs from yvr
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: NetOps: Office Other, task)
Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
NetOps: Office Other
x86_64
Linux
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: rillian, Assigned: dcurado)
References
Details
I was trying to reach our internal fileserver today from the YVR office, and was unable to. Browser just spins for a while and times out. DNS returns an internal ip for 'fs': $ host fs fs.corp.yvr1.mozilla.com is an alias for fs.mv.mozilla.com. fs.mv.mozilla.com has address 10.250.0.34 But I cannot ping that ip, or connect to it over http. mtr suggests the routing is incorrect: 1. fw1.corp.yvr1.mozilla.net 0.0% 3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.0 2. 64.213.70.193 0.0% 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.0 3. ??? i.e. it's routing traffic to a private IP out some global crossing router.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: network-operations → dcurado
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Hi, The IP address that 'fs' is resolving to (10.250.0.34) no longer exists in our network. That was an IP address used in the Mountain View office at Castro Street. Looks like whoever was responsible for that server did not remove the old DNS record. =-( For completeness: when the firewall (also your local router) tries to forward your traffic, it doesn't have a route for 10.250.x.x, so the firewall sends the packet out its default route, which is your local Internet connection. It looks wrong, but it's actually correct. Sorry, I don't have a clue about the internal file server. I'm thing EUS would know? It'll be another 4 hours until people on the West Coast are around. But I will double back at that time and see if I can find out the new name of this resource. Will update this bug once I get the story. Thanks -- Dave
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks for responding. Hopefully we can update the dns record, then. Or delete it if the server no longer exists. Re default routes, I would have expected we'd have null routes for all private subnets we're not using, rather than relying on an upstream carrier to do the right thing?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
I just asked #servicedesk about the file server -- hoping to find someone who knows something. Yeah, you raise a good point -- I suppose we could add a null route for 10/8 so that we crater the packets right away... will give it some thought. Thanks for suggesting it! Will update this bug when I figure out the last word on that file server.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
OK, the word I've got back is that the old fs server is "all kinds of dead" I will remove the dns record, and will also bring up the idea of adding a null route for 10/8 on our edge routers in the next staff meeting. Thanks, Dave
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•2 years ago
|
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•