Closed
Bug 1072428
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
remove requirement for description in Input API
Categories
(Input Graveyard :: Backend, defect)
Input Graveyard
Backend
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: willkg, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: u=dev c=api p= s=)
The Input API for posting feedback requires a description. This is good in a lot of cases, but there are some cases where this is undesirable and leads to crap results.
For example, in order to get around the restriction Loop pre-fills the description with localized strings which make it difficult to suss out unique issues in the resulting data (there are like 200+ "unique strings").
This involves:
1. fixing the api code
2. writing up a test
3. updating the documentation
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: u=dev c=api p=1 s=input.2014q4 → u=dev c=api p= s=input.adam
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Tossing this in the 2015q1 queue.
Whiteboard: u=dev c=api p= s=input.adam → u=dev c=api p= s=input.2015q1
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
There are pretty stiff ramifications to this. I think for now we should push it off and try not to do this.
Having said that, Loop sends the same description often and might be hitting ratelimiting pretty often. I created bug #1120988 for that.
In the meantime, I'm bumping this out of this quarter.
Whiteboard: u=dev c=api p= s=input.2015q1 → u=dev c=api p= s=
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
At one point, we thought about expanding what "feedback" means and what we're collecting. Instead of expanding it, though, we're going to continue use Input feedback as sentiment data and derive sentiment from descriptions. That requires a description.
Further, the primary use case for this bug is gone.
Given those, I'm going to mark this as WONTFIX. If we hit another compelling use case we can rethink things then.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Input → Input Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•